You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> on 2020/08/25 18:48:31 UTC

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.12 based on 1.10.12rc4

Hello Airflow Community,

The vote to release Apache Airflow version 1.10.12 based on 1.10.12rc4 is
now closed.

The vote PASSED with 4 binding "+1", 0 non-binding "+1" and 0 "-1" votes:

"+1" Binding votes:
- Kamil Breguła
- Tomasz Urbaszek
- Jarek Potiuk
- Kaxil Naik

I'll continue with the release process and the release announcement will
follow shortly.

Thanks,
Kaxil Naik

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 12:19 PM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> FYI I've created a PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10493 to add
> what is expected from people verifying the release:
>
> PMCS (legal):
>
> https://github.com/PolideaInternal/airflow/blob/add-instructions-to-verify-the-release/dev/README.md#verifying-the-release-candidate-by-pmcs-legal
>
> Contributors (making sure that release works)
>
> https://github.com/PolideaInternal/airflow/blob/add-instructions-to-verify-the-release/dev/README.md#verifying-if-the-release-works-by-contributors
>
> It contains instructions on how both - PMCs and Contributors can easily
> verify the legal stuff and install release candidates and start testing it.
>
> I hope we will get many more +1s (even non-binding) for this and the future
> releases thanks to that :).
>
> J.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 12:32 PM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> wrote:
>
> > And RAT check as well:
> >
> > [jarek:~/Downloads/test-1.10.12rc4/apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4] % java -jar
> > ../../apache-rat-0.13/apache-rat-0.13.jar -E .rat-excludes -d .
> > Ignored 16 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty lines.
> >
> > *****************************************************
> > Summary
> > -------
> > Generated at: 2020-08-23T12:32:10+02:00
> >
> > Notes: 6
> > Binaries: 125
> > Archives: 0
> > Standards: 1431
> >
> > Apache Licensed: 1428
> > Generated Documents: 0
> >
> > JavaDocs are generated, thus a license header is optional.
> > Generated files do not require license headers.
> >
> > 0 Unknown Licenses
> >
> > *****************************************************
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> I tested just one variant this time :) . BTW - for anyone willing to run
> >> some quick tests as well, it is now super-easy to install and run
> Airflow
> >> in any version:
> >>
> >> 1) `./breeze --install-airflow-version 1.10.12.rc4 --python 3.7
> --backend
> >> postgres`
> >> 2) `tmux`
> >> 3) Hit Ctrl-B followed by "
> >> 4) `airflow resetdb -y`
> >> 5) if you want rbac:
> >>      * Change RBAC setting: `sed "s/rbac = False/rbac = True/" -i
> >> /root/airflow/airflow.cfg`
> >>      * airflow resetdb -y
> >>      * Run`airflow create_user  -r Admin -u airflow -e
> airflow@apache.org
> >> -f Airflow -l User -p airflow
> >> 6) `airflow scheduler`
> >> 7) Ctrl-B "up-arrow"
> >> 8) `airflow webserver`
> >>
> >> http://localhost:28080  is where the UI of Airflow should be waiting
> >>
> >> J.
> >>
> >> *SHA512:*
> >>
> >> [jarek:~/Downloads/test-1.10.12rc4] % for i in *.sha512
> >> do
> >> echo "Checking $i"; gpg --print-md SHA512 `basename $i .sha512 ` | diff
> -
> >> $i
> >> done
> >> Checking apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-bin.tar.gz.sha512
> >> Checking apache_airflow-1.10.12rc4-py2.py3-none-any.whl.sha512
> >> Checking apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-source.tar.gz.sha512
> >>
> >>
> >> *Signature:*
> >>
> >> [jarek:~/Downloads/test-1.10.12rc4] 130 % for i in *.asc
> >>
> >>
> >> do
> >> echo "Checking $i"; gpg --verify `basename $i .sha512 `
> >> done
> >> Checking apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-bin.tar.gz.asc
> >> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-bin.tar.gz'
> >> gpg: Signature made sob, 22 sie 2020, 20:28:28 CEST
> >> gpg:                using RSA key
> 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B
> >> gpg: Good signature from "Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>" [unknown]
> >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> >> owner.
> >> Primary key fingerprint: 1271 7556 040E EF2E EAF1  B9C2 75FC CD0A 25FA
> >> 0E4B
> >> Checking apache_airflow-1.10.12rc4-py2.py3-none-any.whl.asc
> >> gpg: assuming signed data in
> >> 'apache_airflow-1.10.12rc4-py2.py3-none-any.whl'
> >> gpg: Signature made sob, 22 sie 2020, 20:28:31 CEST
> >> gpg:                using RSA key
> 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B
> >> gpg: Good signature from "Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>" [unknown]
> >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> >> owner.
> >> Primary key fingerprint: 1271 7556 040E EF2E EAF1  B9C2 75FC CD0A 25FA
> >> 0E4B
> >> Checking apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-source.tar.gz.asc
> >> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-source.tar.gz'
> >> gpg: Signature made sob, 22 sie 2020, 20:28:25 CEST
> >> gpg:                using RSA key
> 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B
> >> gpg: Good signature from "Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>" [unknown]
> >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> >> owner.
> >> Primary key fingerprint: 1271 7556 040E EF2E EAF1  B9C2 75FC CD0A 25FA
> >> 0E4B
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:16 AM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Tested scheduler and webserver, installed backport-packgages and run
> >>> few DAGs, +1 (binding).
> >>>
> >>> Tomek
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:03 AM Kamil Breguła <
> kamil.bregula@polidea.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > +1 (binding)
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > +1 (binding)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > *Note*: This has only 1 change from 1.10.12rc3 so everything else
> is
> >>> the
> >>> > > same
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hello Apache Airflow Community,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version
> >>> 1.10.12.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The release candidate:
> >>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/1.10.12rc4/
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-source.tar.gz* is a source release
> that
> >>> comes
> >>> > > > with INSTALL instructions.
> >>> > > > *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc4-bin.tar.gz* is the binary Python
> "sdist"
> >>> > > > snapshot.
> >>> > > > *apache_airflow-1.10.12rc4-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python
> >>> wheel
> >>> > > > snapshot.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Public keys are available at:
> >>> https://www.apache.org/dist/airflow/KEYS
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > For convenience, RC is also uploaded on PyPI so you can install
> it
> >>> using
> >>> > > > *pip install apache-airflow==1.10.12rc4*
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Changes from *1.10.12rc3*:
> >>> > > > - Fix broken Kubernetes PodRuntimeInfoEnv (#10478
> >>> > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10478>)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.12rc4/CHANGELOG.txt
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (2020-08-25 18:35
> UTC)
> >>> or
> >>> > > > until the necessary number
> >>> > > > of votes are reached.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>>
> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20200825T1935&p0=136&font=cursive
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> >>> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> >>> community are
> >>> > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so
> >>> it's
> >>> > > now
> >>> > > > simply 1.10.12. This will allow us to rename the artifact without
> >>> > > modifying
> >>> > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks,
> >>> > > > Kaxil Naik
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Jarek Potiuk
> >> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> >>
> >> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> >> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jarek Potiuk
> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> >
> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>