You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2007/07/20 14:34:20 UTC

Re: Vbounce and Shortcircuit hitting read receipts ?

Yep, this is entirely possible; I don't think I tested with any
read receipts :(

--j.

neil writes:
> Hi;
>    Any one else seeing random FPs with VBounce rules and short circuit 
> as described here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset
> 
> # bounce messages: always ignored if the vbounce plugin is active
> priority ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE -700
> shortcircuit ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE spam
> score ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE 20
> 
> On another box without the short circuit rule, the message gets a low 
> score as would be expected.
> 
> I have whitelist_bounce_relays configured with my mail servers.
> 
> (I have replaced the sender and recipients names and email addresses and 
> removed a couple of others in the receipt list.)
> 
> spamassassin -D < /tmp/recipt.txt1
> <snip>
> [7710] dbg: shortcircuit: s/c spam due to ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE, using 
> score of 100
> [7710] dbg: check: is spam? score=20.1 required=15
> [7710] dbg: check: tests=ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,BOUNCE_MESSAGE
> [7710] dbg: check: subtests=__BOUNCE_CTYPE,__HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS
> <snip>
> 
> from 20_vbounce.cf
> body __HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS     eval:have_any_bounce_relays()
> tflags __HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS   nice
> 
> header   __BOUNCE_CTYPE Content-Type =~ /\bmultipart\/report\b/
> 
> 
> 
> Content analysis details:   (20.1 points, 15.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- 
> --------------------------------------------------
>  0.1 BOUNCE_MESSAGE         MTA bounce message
>   20 ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE     Message is some kind of bounce message
> 
> 
> 
> Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
>           by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP
>           id 
> <20...@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
>           for <re...@example.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:12:01 +0100
> Received: from sendershome ([82.19.189.159])
>           by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP
>           id 
> <20...@sendershome>
>           for <re...@example.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:12:01 +0100
> Message-ID: <00...@sendershome>
> From: "Some Sender" <se...@senderdomain.example.com>
> To: "Some Recipient" <re...@example.com>
> References: <00...@user8b4965acfc>
> Subject: Read: My e mail
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:11:59 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/report;
>         boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20";
>         report-type=disposition-notification
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> This is a receipt for the mail you sent to
> "Sender Sender"  <se...@senderdomain.example.com> at 20/07/2007 10:55
> 
> 
> This receipt verifies that the message has been displayed on the =
> recipient's computer at 20/07/2007 11:11
> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20
> Content-Type: message/disposition-notification
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;recipient@example.com
> Original-Message-ID: <00...@user8b4965acfc>
> Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20--
> 
> 
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_00C9_01C7CAC7.493F3410--

Re: Vbounce and Shortcircuit hitting read receipts ?

Posted by neil <ne...@supanet.net.uk>.
Hi;
     Just commented out the short circuit vbounce rule on the box I did 
the tests on and I get a low score (3.3). I dont know if you want to 
test this and update the wiki or if I should raise it as a bug.

    I'd better remove that rule from my production boxen. Changes to 
live servers, on a Friday afternoon. What could possibly go wrong ;-)

Rgds
N.


Justin Mason wrote:
> Yep, this is entirely possible; I don't think I tested with any
> read receipts :(
>
> --j.
>
> neil writes:
>   
>> Hi;
>>    Any one else seeing random FPs with VBounce rules and short circuit 
>> as described here:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset
>>
>> # bounce messages: always ignored if the vbounce plugin is active
>> priority ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE -700
>> shortcircuit ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE spam
>> score ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE 20
>>
>> On another box without the short circuit rule, the message gets a low 
>> score as would be expected.
>>
>> I have whitelist_bounce_relays configured with my mail servers.
>>
>> (I have replaced the sender and recipients names and email addresses and 
>> removed a couple of others in the receipt list.)
>>
>> spamassassin -D < /tmp/recipt.txt1
>> <snip>
>> [7710] dbg: shortcircuit: s/c spam due to ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE, using 
>> score of 100
>> [7710] dbg: check: is spam? score=20.1 required=15
>> [7710] dbg: check: tests=ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,BOUNCE_MESSAGE
>> [7710] dbg: check: subtests=__BOUNCE_CTYPE,__HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS
>> <snip>
>>
>> from 20_vbounce.cf
>> body __HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS     eval:have_any_bounce_relays()
>> tflags __HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS   nice
>>
>> header   __BOUNCE_CTYPE Content-Type =~ /\bmultipart\/report\b/
>>
>>
>>
>> Content analysis details:   (20.1 points, 15.0 required)
>>
>>  pts rule name              description
>> ---- ---------------------- 
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>  0.1 BOUNCE_MESSAGE         MTA bounce message
>>   20 ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE     Message is some kind of bounce message
>>
>>
>>
>> Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
>>           by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP
>>           id 
>> <20...@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
>>           for <re...@example.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:12:01 +0100
>> Received: from sendershome ([82.19.189.159])
>>           by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP
>>           id 
>> <20...@sendershome>
>>           for <re...@example.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:12:01 +0100
>> Message-ID: <00...@sendershome>
>> From: "Some Sender" <se...@senderdomain.example.com>
>> To: "Some Recipient" <re...@example.com>
>> References: <00...@user8b4965acfc>
>> Subject: Read: My e mail
>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:11:59 +0100
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/report;
>>         boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20";
>>         report-type=disposition-notification
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
>>
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>>
>> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>>         charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> This is a receipt for the mail you sent to
>> "Sender Sender"  <se...@senderdomain.example.com> at 20/07/2007 10:55
>>
>>
>> This receipt verifies that the message has been displayed on the =
>> recipient's computer at 20/07/2007 11:11
>> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20
>> Content-Type: message/disposition-notification
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;recipient@example.com
>> Original-Message-ID: <00...@user8b4965acfc>
>> Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed
>>
>> ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C7CABE.CA6E6D20--
>>
>>
>>
>> ------=_NextPart_000_00C9_01C7CAC7.493F3410--
>>     
>
>