You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> on 2019/07/02 23:49:10 UTC
[VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as
discussed[1] and documented[2].
Please vote as follows:
+1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
-1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll
try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote
before then.
1:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com>.
Thanks all for validating the process and voting.
I'm closing the vote with 5 binding +1s and 4 non-binding +1s. Binding
votes were provided by:
Maximilian Michels
Pablo Estrada
Ismaël Mejía
Lukasz Cwik
Kenneth Knowles
I'll work on getting the doc turned into a PR to update our websites
release guide and also work on creating RC #2 for the Guava 26.0 upgrade
following the guide.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:12 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Luke for writing a thorough guide for this.
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:27 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote:
> >> > +1 LGTM
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> >> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <ehudm@google.com
> >> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process,
> >> > my question might be trivial to someone actually performing
> the
> >> > release.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> >> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release
> >> > process as discussed[1] and documented[2].
> >> >
> >> > Please vote as follows:
> >> > +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
> >> > -1: The vendored release process needs to change because
> ...
> >> >
> >> > Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday
> >> > schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results
> >> > on July 9th so please vote before then.
> >> >
> >> > 1:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> > 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Luke for writing a thorough guide for this.
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:27 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote:
>> > +1 LGTM
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <ehudm@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process,
>> > my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the
>> > release.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
>> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release
>> > process as discussed[1] and documented[2].
>> >
>> > Please vote as follows:
>> > +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
>> > -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>> >
>> > Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday
>> > schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results
>> > on July 9th so please vote before then.
>> >
>> > 1: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> > 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Pablo Estrada <pa...@google.com>.
Thanks Luke for writing a thorough guide for this.
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:27 PM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote:
> > +1 LGTM
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <ehudm@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process,
> > my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the
> > release.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> > <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release
> > process as discussed[1] and documented[2].
> >
> > Please vote as follows:
> > +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
> > -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
> >
> > Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday
> > schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results
> > on July 9th so please vote before then.
> >
> > 1:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
+1
On 09.07.19 22:16, Udi Meiri wrote:
> +1 LGTM
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <ehudm@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process,
> my question might be trivial to someone actually performing the
> release.
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release
> process as discussed[1] and documented[2].
>
> Please vote as follows:
> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>
> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday
> schedule, I'll try to close the vote and tally the results
> on July 9th so please vote before then.
>
> 1: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com>.
+1 LGTM
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:54 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, my
>> question might be trivial to someone actually performing the release.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as
>>> discussed[1] and documented[2].
>>>
>>> Please vote as follows:
>>> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
>>> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>>>
>>> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll
>>> try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote
>>> before then.
>>>
>>> 1:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com>.
Thanks for taking a look. I followed up on your questions.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
> I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, my question
> might be trivial to someone actually performing the release.
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as
>> discussed[1] and documented[2].
>>
>> Please vote as follows:
>> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
>> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>>
>> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll
>> try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote
>> before then.
>>
>> 1:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Vendored dependencies release process
Posted by Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com>.
I left some comments. Being new to the Beam releasing process, my question
might be trivial to someone actually performing the release.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> Please vote based on the vendored dependencies release process as
> discussed[1] and documented[2].
>
> Please vote as follows:
> +1: Adopt the vendored dependency release process
> -1: The vendored release process needs to change because ...
>
> Since many people in the US may be out due to the holiday schedule, I'll
> try to close the vote and tally the results on July 9th so please vote
> before then.
>
> 1:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e2c49a5efaee2ad416b083fbf3b9b6db60fdb04750208bfc34cecaf0@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> 2: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-vendored-artifacts
>