You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> on 2011/07/27 12:17:36 UTC
[LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Hi All,
We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
Please suggest.
Thanks.
"Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
www.cybage.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
That sounds like 'yes we should do that asap' to me :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very nearly so, yes. :)
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
>>> the 1.x trunk.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
>>>> myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
>>>>
>>>> JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
>>>> Proxy need updating.
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>>>>> following components depend on Lang:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Chain
>>>>> * Configuration
>>>>> * JCS
>>>>> * Proxy
>>>>>
>>>>> and in the Sandbox:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Flatfile
>>>>> * Pipeline
>>>>>
>>>>> Hen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>>>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>>>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>>>>> need both dependencies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
Very nearly so, yes. :)
Matt
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
>> the 1.x trunk.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
>>> myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
>>>
>>> JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
>>> Proxy need updating.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>>>> following components depend on Lang:
>>>>
>>>> * Chain
>>>> * Configuration
>>>> * JCS
>>>> * Proxy
>>>>
>>>> and in the Sandbox:
>>>>
>>>> * Flatfile
>>>> * Pipeline
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>>>> need both dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
> the 1.x trunk.
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
>> myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
>>
>> JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
>> Proxy need updating.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>>> following components depend on Lang:
>>>
>>> * Chain
>>> * Configuration
>>> * JCS
>>> * Proxy
>>>
>>> and in the Sandbox:
>>>
>>> * Flatfile
>>> * Pipeline
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>>> need both dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about
the 1.x trunk.
Matt
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
> myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
>
> JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
> Proxy need updating.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>> following components depend on Lang:
>>
>> * Chain
>> * Configuration
>> * JCS
>> * Proxy
>>
>> and in the Sandbox:
>>
>> * Flatfile
>> * Pipeline
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>> need both dependencies.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>> Stephen
>>>>
>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>
>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Am 29.07.2011 00:26, schrieb Henri Yandell:
> Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
> myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
>
> JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
> Proxy need updating.
Configuration currently still targets Java 1.4. I would like to get a
new release (maybe the last one compatible with this version) out soon.
Unfortunately, work on a re-designed, enhanced 1.5+ version is stuck.
Maybe we should just polish the existing APIs for Java 1.5 and avoid
major changes? Then it would not be too unrealistic that a 2.0 version
(or how it will be called) can be published in a reasonable time frame.
Oliver
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell<fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>> following components depend on Lang:
>>
>> * Chain
>> * Configuration
>> * JCS
>> * Proxy
>>
>> and in the Sandbox:
>>
>> * Flatfile
>> * Pipeline
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict<pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>> need both dependencies.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>> Stephen
>>>>
>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam<ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>
>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on
myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang.
JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and
Proxy need updating.
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
> following components depend on Lang:
>
> * Chain
> * Configuration
> * JCS
> * Proxy
>
> and in the Sandbox:
>
> * Flatfile
> * Pipeline
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>> need both dependencies.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>
>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>
>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>
>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Go for it :)
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
> You know, it would probably be nice for our end users to note what
> this email contained for our home page:
>
> 1) A clear explanation that Commons Lang 3 and 2/1 can co-exist side
> by side and that upgrading to 3 doesn't mean you won't still need
> previous versions.
> 2) What we know other Apache Commons depend on 2.x
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Or maybe I won't hit [flatfile], since I see you've just done so. ;) Thanks!
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
>>> branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>>>> following components depend on Lang:
>>>>
>>>> * Chain
>>>> * Configuration
>>>> * JCS
>>>> * Proxy
>>>>
>>>> and in the Sandbox:
>>>>
>>>> * Flatfile
>>>> * Pipeline
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>>>> need both dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
You know, it would probably be nice for our end users to note what
this email contained for our home page:
1) A clear explanation that Commons Lang 3 and 2/1 can co-exist side
by side and that upgrading to 3 doesn't mean you won't still need
previous versions.
2) What we know other Apache Commons depend on 2.x
Paul
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or maybe I won't hit [flatfile], since I see you've just done so. ;) Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
>> branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>>> following components depend on Lang:
>>>
>>> * Chain
>>> * Configuration
>>> * JCS
>>> * Proxy
>>>
>>> and in the Sandbox:
>>>
>>> * Flatfile
>>> * Pipeline
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>>> need both dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
Or maybe I won't hit [flatfile], since I see you've just done so. ;) Thanks!
Matt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
> branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
>> following components depend on Lang:
>>
>> * Chain
>> * Configuration
>> * JCS
>> * Proxy
>>
>> and in the Sandbox:
>>
>> * Flatfile
>> * Pipeline
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>>> need both dependencies.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>>> Stephen
>>>>
>>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>>
>>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2
branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
> following components depend on Lang:
>
> * Chain
> * Configuration
> * JCS
> * Proxy
>
> and in the Sandbox:
>
> * Flatfile
> * Pipeline
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
>> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
>> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
>> need both dependencies.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>>
>>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>>
>>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>>
>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>>> www.cybage.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the
following components depend on Lang:
* Chain
* Configuration
* JCS
* Proxy
and in the Sandbox:
* Flatfile
* Pipeline
Hen
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
> 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
> Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
> need both dependencies.
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
>> Stephen
>>
>> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>>
>>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>>
>>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>>
>>> Please suggest.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>>> www.cybage.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and
3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons
Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will
need both dependencies.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne
<sc...@joda.org> wrote:
> You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
> Stephen
>
> On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>>
>> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>>
>> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>>
>> Please suggest.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
>> www.cybage.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>.
You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old.
Stephen
On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam <ro...@cybage.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues.
>
> After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.1 with Apache Commons Lang 3.0 we get some compilation errors since the class org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NestableException is being referred internally in the class files of org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationException.
>
> To summarize the common lang jar to 3.0 version is not compatible with common configuration jar latest version.
>
> Please suggest.
>
> Thanks.
>
> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or attachment."
> www.cybage.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org