You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/30 02:03:34 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (SOLR-1739) index of facet fields are not same as original string in record

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1739.
----------------------------

    Resolution: Not A Problem

w/o knowing more details about your schema, this seems to be working exactly as expected.

If you have a question about behavior you are seeing from solr, and are not 100% certain that it is a bug (bug == not functioning as documented) then you should post a question to the solr-user mailing list before opening a Jira issue.

In a nutshell: faceting works based on the indexed values; if you need/want different constraints to be displayed for a facet field, then you should use a different analyzer.

> index of facet fields are not same as original string in record
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1739
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1739
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>         Environment: Solr search engine is deployed in tomcat and running in windows OS.
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswari
>
> Hi, 
>  I am new to Solr. I found facets fields does not reflect the original string in the record. For example, 
> the returned xml is, 
> - <doc> 
>   <str name="g_number">G-EUPE</str> 
> </doc> 
> - <lst name="facet_counts"> 
>   <lst name="facet_queries" /> 
> - <lst name="facet_fields"> 
> - <lst name="g_number"> 
>   <int name="gupe">1</int> 
> </lst> 
>   </lst> 
> -  <lst name="facet_dates" /> 
>   </lst> 
> Here, "G-EUPE" is displayed under facet field as 'gupe' where it is not capital and missing '-' from the original string. Is there any way we could fix this to match the original text in record? Thanks in advance. 
> Regards, 
> uma

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.