You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ivan Bessonov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/01/11 08:45:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-21234) Acquired checkpoint read lock waits for schedules checkpoint write unlock sometimes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ivan Bessonov updated IGNITE-21234:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Acquired checkpoint read lock waits for schedules checkpoint write unlock sometimes (was: Checkpoint read lock waits for checkpoint write unlock sometimes)
> Acquired checkpoint read lock waits for schedules checkpoint write unlock sometimes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-21234
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21234
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ivan Bessonov
> Assignee: Ivan Bessonov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In a situation where we have "too many dirty pages" we trigger checkpoint and wait until it starts. This can take seconds, because we have to flush free-lists before acquiring checkpoint write lock. This can cause severe dips in performance for no good reason.
> I suggest introducing two modes for triggering checkpoints when we have too many dirty pages: soft threshold and hard threshold.
> * soft - trigger checkpoint, but don't wait for its start. Just continue all operations as usual. Make it like a current threshold - 75% of any existing memory segment must be dirty.
> * hard - trigger checkpoint and wait until it starts. The way it behaves right now. Make it higher than current threshold - 90% of any existing memory segment must be dirty.
> Maybe we should use different values for thresholds, that should be discussed during the review
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)