You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@logging.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/09/12 17:30:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1121) LoggerConfig performance
improvement: remove waitForCompletion and associated fields
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17194806#comment-17194806 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1121:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 0e2ad68dc0b9dad07194a6b61142135375a4ec64 in logging-log4j2's branch refs/heads/master from Matt Sicker
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j2.git;h=0e2ad68 ]
Add tests for LOG4J2-1121 and LOG4J2-2919
Signed-off-by: Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
> LoggerConfig performance improvement: remove waitForCompletion and associated fields
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1121
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.3
> Reporter: Remko Popma
> Assignee: Remko Popma
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.4
>
>
> This ticket follows up on LOG4J2-1120. Out of the three changes identified in LOG4J2-1120, only two could be implemented in time for the 2.4 release.
> This ticket tracks the remaining work for the third change:
> * Since {{clearAppenders()}} is only called after all appenders have been stopped, {{waitForCompletion()}} may no longer be necessary (unless I am missing something here). If so, the {{shutdownLock}}, {{shutdown}} and {{counter}} fields can be removed. Not incrementing the atomic counters with every event in the hot path should give better performance.
> LOG4J2-1120 shows benchmark results that support this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)