You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/25 15:54:56 UTC
Neo4j 2.3.3 bump for TinkerPop3.
Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
TinkerPop 3.2.0 will go into code 1.5 weeks. Is it possible to get a bump with Neo4j 2.3.3?
Thank you very much,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
Re: Neo4j 2.3.3 bump for TinkerPop3.
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hello Michael,
Thank you for the bump. I have since run integration tests on 2.3.3 and everything works as expected.
Take care,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Any chance we can get a bump this week? We put TP 3.2.0 up to VOTE on Friday.
>
> Thank you,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We were aiming to finish up work for 3.2.0 by April 1 with a week of code
>> freeze/testing for the week to follow.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Michael Hunger <
>> michael.hunger@neotechnology.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marko,
>>>
>>> sure, I give it a go. It is a minor bugfix-release though so it shouldn't
>>> be that critical.
>>>
>>> What's the timeline for the next release? As Neo4j 3.0.0 is due soon, it
>>> would make sense to integrate that into your next release.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>> Am 25.03.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
>>>>
>>>> TinkerPop 3.2.0 will go into code 1.5 weeks. Is it possible to get a
>>> bump with Neo4j 2.3.3?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>> Marko.
>>>>
>>>> http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Neo4j 2.3.3 bump for TinkerPop3.
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hi Michael,
Any chance we can get a bump this week? We put TP 3.2.0 up to VOTE on Friday.
Thank you,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Mar 25, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We were aiming to finish up work for 3.2.0 by April 1 with a week of code
> freeze/testing for the week to follow.
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Michael Hunger <
> michael.hunger@neotechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marko,
>>
>> sure, I give it a go. It is a minor bugfix-release though so it shouldn't
>> be that critical.
>>
>> What's the timeline for the next release? As Neo4j 3.0.0 is due soon, it
>> would make sense to integrate that into your next release.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>> Am 25.03.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
>>>
>>> TinkerPop 3.2.0 will go into code 1.5 weeks. Is it possible to get a
>> bump with Neo4j 2.3.3?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much,
>>> Marko.
>>>
>>> http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/>
>>
>>
Re: Neo4j 2.3.3 bump for TinkerPop3.
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
We were aiming to finish up work for 3.2.0 by April 1 with a week of code
freeze/testing for the week to follow.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Michael Hunger <
michael.hunger@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Hi Marko,
>
> sure, I give it a go. It is a minor bugfix-release though so it shouldn't
> be that critical.
>
> What's the timeline for the next release? As Neo4j 3.0.0 is due soon, it
> would make sense to integrate that into your next release.
>
> Michael
>
> > Am 25.03.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
> >
> > TinkerPop 3.2.0 will go into code 1.5 weeks. Is it possible to get a
> bump with Neo4j 2.3.3?
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/>
>
>
Re: Neo4j 2.3.3 bump for TinkerPop3.
Posted by Michael Hunger <mi...@neotechnology.com>.
Hi Marko,
sure, I give it a go. It is a minor bugfix-release though so it shouldn't be that critical.
What's the timeline for the next release? As Neo4j 3.0.0 is due soon, it would make sense to integrate that into your next release.
Michael
> Am 25.03.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
>
> TinkerPop 3.2.0 will go into code 1.5 weeks. Is it possible to get a bump with Neo4j 2.3.3?
>
> Thank you very much,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com <http://markorodriguez.com/>