You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Thilo Frotscher <th...@web.de> on 2006/12/11 01:43:59 UTC
[Axis2] WSDL2Java option -u
Hi!
Can someone please explain to me the WSDL2Java option -u?
According to the documentation this is meant to do the
following:
"This option specifies whether to unpack the classes and
generate separate classes for the databinders."
- What exactly does that mean? Can you please explain in
more detail what this option is supposed to do?
- When I use this option with my WSDL document, all that happens
is that a Java interface is generated and the stub class
implements this interface. There don't seem to be any other
differences compared to using WSDL2Java without the -u option.
This doesn't quite seem to match the above...
Can you please shed some light on this?
Thanks,
Thilo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] WSDL2Java option -u
Posted by Thilo Frotscher <th...@web.de>.
Hi!
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> The -u option is only meaningful for ADB
Shouldn't it be -Eu then? Or are there any other data binding
frameworks this option can be used with?
> where I believe it controls whether the classes are organized into
> separate .java source files (as opposed to all globbed together).
Got that now, thanks. In addition to this, -u results in a Java
interface which is implemented by the generated stub class. While
such an interface can be useful, I can't see how its generation
relates to actual meaning of this option. Is the interface generation
an accidental feature perhaps that should actually have its own
option?
Thanks,
Thilo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [Axis2] WSDL2Java option -u
Posted by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>.
Hi Thilo,
The -u option is only meaningful for ADB, where I believe it controls
whether the classes are organized into separate .java source files (as
opposed to all globbed together).
- Dennis
Thilo Frotscher wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Can someone please explain to me the WSDL2Java option -u?
> According to the documentation this is meant to do the
> following:
>
> "This option specifies whether to unpack the classes and
> generate separate classes for the databinders."
>
> - What exactly does that mean? Can you please explain in
> more detail what this option is supposed to do?
>
> - When I use this option with my WSDL document, all that happens
> is that a Java interface is generated and the stub class
> implements this interface. There don't seem to be any other
> differences compared to using WSDL2Java without the -u option.
> This doesn't quite seem to match the above...
>
> Can you please shed some light on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Thilo
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org