Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right  
now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and  
activation specs.

Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't  
seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that.

thanks
david jencks

On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's   The  
> other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had  
> issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
>
> Thanks for your critical eyes.
>
> On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> Please review the specifications located at http:// 
>> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
>>
>> We are voting these in a block.  Failures will be removed from the  
>> block and others will proceed forward.
>>
>> Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX

[Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>]

+1 on releasing these specs.

Lin

Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
> order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
> Axis2).
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On 7/4/07, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right
>> now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and
>> activation specs.
>>
>> Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't
>> seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>> > I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's   The
>> > other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
>> > issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your critical eyes.
>> >
>> > On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Please review the specifications located at http://
>> >> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
>> >>
>> >> We are voting these in a block.  Failures will be removed from the
>> >> block and others will proceed forward.
>> >>
>> >> Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX

[Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>]

+1

-Donald

Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
> order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
> Axis2).
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On 7/4/07, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right
>> now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and
>> activation specs.
>>
>> Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't
>> seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>> > I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's   The
>> > other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
>> > issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your critical eyes.
>> >
>> > On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Please review the specifications located at http://
>> >> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
>> >>
>> >> We are voting these in a block.  Failures will be removed from the
>> >> block and others will proceed forward.
>> >>
>> >> Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX

[Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>]

I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
Axis2).

Jarek

On 7/4/07, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right
> now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and
> activation specs.
>
> Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't
> seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's   The
> > other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
> > issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
> >
> > Thanks for your critical eyes.
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >
> >> Please review the specifications located at http://
> >> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
> >>
> >> We are voting these in a block.  Failures will be removed from the
> >> block and others will proceed forward.
> >>
> >> Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >
>
>