You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> on 2007/04/19 15:26:37 UTC
Patch Applied ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435
Hi,
Can anyone confirm if Tomas's patch was applied please ? Can't see any
subversion commits for it.
Thanks,
Marnie
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marnie McCormack (JIRA) <qp...@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Apr 19, 2007 2:24 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (QPID-435) HeadersExchangeTest fails
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490051]
Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-435:
---------------------------------------
Can anyone confirm if Tomas's patch was applied please ? Can't see any
subversion commits for it.
> HeadersExchangeTest fails
> -------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-435
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Dot Net Client
> Affects Versions: M2
> Environment: .NET 2.0
> Reporter: Tomas Restrepo
> Fix For: M2
>
> Attachments: QPID-435.diff
>
>
> The HeadersExchangeTest integration test in Qpid.Client.Tests is currently
failing. After tracing the code, two bugs were identified:
> - The creation of the FieldTable for the Queue.Bind() arguments was using
the old "S"+"name" convention for field table names, which is no longer used
after the fieldtable and message header refactorings
> - The consumer was created with NoLocal=True, which prevented the server
to send the messages back to the waiting client.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
RE: Patch Applied ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435
Posted by Tomas Restrepo <to...@devdeo.com>.
Marnie,
> Can anyone confirm if Tomas's patch was applied please ? Can't see any
> subversion commits for it.
>
AFAIK, the following patches I've submitted are still pending application:
QPID-398, QPID-441, QPID-435
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
RE: Patch Applied ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435
Posted by Tomas Restrepo <to...@devdeo.com>.
Hi Marnie,
> On closer inspection I see that they're all for the .NET client (doh).
> I
> guess the best thing (given the limited amount of expertise on the .NET
> client) is probably to wait for your committer rights now - what do you
> think ?
That's fine by me. Hopefully we won't have to wait too long to get the
accounts setup now :)
Tomas Restrepo
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
Re: Patch Applied ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-435
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for contributing these !
On closer inspection I see that they're all for the .NET client (doh). I
guess the best thing (given the limited amount of expertise on the .NET
client) is probably to wait for your committer rights now - what do you
think ?
(I'd feel a little out of my comfort zone attempting to apply them myself.)
If any other committer feels more confident - please can you apply for Tomas
? Thanks.
Regards,
Marnie
On 4/19/07, Tomas Restrepo <to...@devdeo.com> wrote:
>
> Marnie,
> > Can anyone confirm if Tomas's patch was applied please ? Can't see any
> > subversion commits for it.
> >
>
> AFAIK, the following patches I've submitted are still pending application:
>
> QPID-398, QPID-441, QPID-435
>
>
> Tomas Restrepo
> http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/
>
>
>
>
>