You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2008/02/09 15:19:03 UTC
Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Hi Marco, Rashko,
Marco, as described below by Rashko, you introduced the "Vendor Product" concept in r607072. I wonder why and why it replaced
ProductSuppliers ?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Rashko Rejmer" <rr...@iguanait.com>
> In r607072 the label from ProductTabBar was changed from "Supplier" to
> "Vendor Product". Is this made intentionally or by mistake?
>
> Regards,
> Rashko Rejmer
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:38 -0800, Ritz123 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone please point me to the table which links products with its
>> supplier?
>>
>> Also, seems like when you create the product, one cannot specify either the
>> supplier directly or add the party with the supplier role. Isnt that
>> absolutely required? At least in my application, a product needs to have a
>> supplier and a manufacturer.
>
RE: Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by "skip@thedevers" <sk...@thedevers.org>.
Thanks Jacopo, shoulda seen that.
Skip
-----Original Message-----
From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:tiz@sastau.it]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:24 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Hi Skip,
if you have several suppliers for the same product you can use the
supplierPrefOrderId field to set the preferred ones.
10_MAIN_SUPPL has the meaning of "main supplier" for the product.
Jacopo
skip@thedevers wrote:
> There is an entity SupplierProduct. There is a field
> SupplierProduct.supplierPrefOrderId which in the demo data contains
> 10_MAIN_SUPPL.
>
> This is used in only one place that I can find BOMNode.isManufactured()
>
> It is not clear to me from the context what the purpose of this field is
and
> what is the meaning of 10_MAIN_SUPPL.
>
> Can anyone fill me in?
>
> Skip
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1266 - Release Date: 2/8/2008
> 10:06 AM
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008
11:54 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008
11:54 AM
Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ti...@sastau.it>.
Hi Skip,
if you have several suppliers for the same product you can use the
supplierPrefOrderId field to set the preferred ones.
10_MAIN_SUPPL has the meaning of "main supplier" for the product.
Jacopo
skip@thedevers wrote:
> There is an entity SupplierProduct. There is a field
> SupplierProduct.supplierPrefOrderId which in the demo data contains
> 10_MAIN_SUPPL.
>
> This is used in only one place that I can find BOMNode.isManufactured()
>
> It is not clear to me from the context what the purpose of this field is and
> what is the meaning of 10_MAIN_SUPPL.
>
> Can anyone fill me in?
>
> Skip
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1266 - Release Date: 2/8/2008
> 10:06 AM
Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by "skip@thedevers" <sk...@thedevers.org>.
There is an entity SupplierProduct. There is a field
SupplierProduct.supplierPrefOrderId which in the demo data contains
10_MAIN_SUPPL.
This is used in only one place that I can find BOMNode.isManufactured()
It is not clear to me from the context what the purpose of this field is and
what is the meaning of 10_MAIN_SUPPL.
Can anyone fill me in?
Skip
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.21/1266 - Release Date: 2/8/2008
10:06 AM
Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Yes, that is incorrect. There is a "Vendor" tab, and this one should
be labelled "Supplier", so the change to that was erroneous, or
something along those lines.
-David
On Feb 9, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Yes but then why has "Vendor ¨Product" replaced "Supplier" in this
> screen ?
> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/catalog/control/EditProductSuppliers?productId=GZ-1000
>
> In french it was before "Fournisseurs" as you can check here
> https://demo40.hotwaxmedia.com/catalog/control/EditProductSuppliers?productId=GZ-1000
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "David E Jones" <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>
>> Those are very different entities for very different purposes.
>>
>> A Vendor is a Party in the system that sells something.
>>
>> A Supplier is a Party in the system that you buy things from.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marco, Rashko,
>>>
>>> Marco, as described below by Rashko, you introduced the "Vendor
>>> Product" concept in r607072. I wonder why and why it replaced
>>> ProductSuppliers ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Rashko Rejmer" <rr...@iguanait.com>
>>>> In r607072 the label from ProductTabBar was changed from
>>>> "Supplier" to
>>>> "Vendor Product". Is this made intentionally or by mistake?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rashko Rejmer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:38 -0800, Ritz123 wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please point me to the table which links products
>>>>> with its
>>>>> supplier?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, seems like when you create the product, one cannot
>>>>> specify either the
>>>>> supplier directly or add the party with the supplier role. Isnt
>>>>> that
>>>>> absolutely required? At least in my application, a product
>>>>> needs to have a
>>>>> supplier and a manufacturer.
>>>
>>
>
Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Yes but then why has "Vendor ¨Product" replaced "Supplier" in this screen ?
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/catalog/control/EditProductSuppliers?productId=GZ-1000
In french it was before "Fournisseurs" as you can check here
https://demo40.hotwaxmedia.com/catalog/control/EditProductSuppliers?productId=GZ-1000
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>
> Those are very different entities for very different purposes.
>
> A Vendor is a Party in the system that sells something.
>
> A Supplier is a Party in the system that you buy things from.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Hi Marco, Rashko,
>>
>> Marco, as described below by Rashko, you introduced the "Vendor Product" concept in r607072. I wonder why and why it replaced
>> ProductSuppliers ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Rashko Rejmer" <rr...@iguanait.com>
>>> In r607072 the label from ProductTabBar was changed from "Supplier" to
>>> "Vendor Product". Is this made intentionally or by mistake?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rashko Rejmer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:38 -0800, Ritz123 wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please point me to the table which links products with its
>>>> supplier?
>>>>
>>>> Also, seems like when you create the product, one cannot specify either the
>>>> supplier directly or add the party with the supplier role. Isnt that
>>>> absolutely required? At least in my application, a product needs to have a
>>>> supplier and a manufacturer.
>>
>
>
Re: Product - Supplier relationship
Posted by David E Jones <jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Those are very different entities for very different purposes.
A Vendor is a Party in the system that sells something.
A Supplier is a Party in the system that you buy things from.
-David
On Feb 9, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Marco, Rashko,
>
> Marco, as described below by Rashko, you introduced the "Vendor
> Product" concept in r607072. I wonder why and why it replaced
> ProductSuppliers ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Rashko Rejmer" <rr...@iguanait.com>
>> In r607072 the label from ProductTabBar was changed from "Supplier"
>> to
>> "Vendor Product". Is this made intentionally or by mistake?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rashko Rejmer
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 12:38 -0800, Ritz123 wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can someone please point me to the table which links products with
>>> its
>>> supplier?
>>>
>>> Also, seems like when you create the product, one cannot specify
>>> either the
>>> supplier directly or add the party with the supplier role. Isnt that
>>> absolutely required? At least in my application, a product needs
>>> to have a
>>> supplier and a manufacturer.
>