Pushing 0.5 RC#1

[Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>]

Hi Folks,
I am on digest emails so I have lost the thread in my email, however
looking at the VOTE thread for the 0.5 release it would appear that we are
good to go with the release
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40climate.apache.org/msg02480.html
Is there anything which is blocking this (apart from obvious holidays,
peoples private time and private lives, generally being overwhelmed, etc
HAHAHA).
Looking forward to seeing 1.0 in 2015. I spoke to a TON of people (mainly
cryosphere scientists) at AGU about OCW... I sent them info about what the
toolkit is. This resulted in about 40 or so emails which I've just now
replied to. I'm also trying to get people over to our list so that more
scientists can have an input in what they would like OCW to be.
Thanks folks
Lewis

-- 
*Lewis*

Re: Pushing 0.5 RC#1

[Michael Joyce <ml...@gmail.com>]

Heya Lewis,

We're missing a +1 on the release still I believe. I think everything got a
bit buried over the holidays :)

On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> I am on digest emails so I have lost the thread in my email, however
> looking at the VOTE thread for the 0.5 release it would appear that we are
> good to go with the release
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40climate.apache.org/msg02480.html
> Is there anything which is blocking this (apart from obvious holidays,
> peoples private time and private lives, generally being overwhelmed, etc
> HAHAHA).
> Looking forward to seeing 1.0 in 2015. I spoke to a TON of people (mainly
> cryosphere scientists) at AGU about OCW... I sent them info about what the
> toolkit is. This resulted in about 40 or so emails which I've just now
> replied to. I'm also trying to get people over to our list so that more
> scientists can have an input in what they would like OCW to be.
> Thanks folks
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>


-- 
----------------
Mike

Re: Pushing 0.5 RC#1

["Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>]

Please push!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 8:16 AM
To: "dev@climate.apache.org" <de...@climate.apache.org>
Subject: Pushing 0.5 RC#1

>Hi Folks,
>I am on digest emails so I have lost the thread in my email, however
>looking at the VOTE thread for the 0.5 release it would appear that we are
>good to go with the release
>http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40climate.apache.org/msg02480.html
>Is there anything which is blocking this (apart from obvious holidays,
>peoples private time and private lives, generally being overwhelmed, etc
>HAHAHA).
>Looking forward to seeing 1.0 in 2015. I spoke to a TON of people (mainly
>cryosphere scientists) at AGU about OCW... I sent them info about what the
>toolkit is. This resulted in about 40 or so emails which I've just now
>replied to. I'm also trying to get people over to our list so that more
>scientists can have an input in what they would like OCW to be.
>Thanks folks
>Lewis
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*