You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Thomas Mueller (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/02/04 13:14:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8711) Queries with facets should not use traversal

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17029830#comment-17029830 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8711:
-------------------------------------

See pull request https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/174

> Queries with facets should not use traversal
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-8711
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>            Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: amrit
>
> Consider a scenario where a query is there with facets and the traversal cost is less than the index cost that serves the facet query . This would be problematic.
>  
> In this case we should maybe set the traversal cost to infinity so that traversal is not an option for queries with facets.
>  
> In case there is no index available to serve this faceted query we can probably throw an exception with a meaningful message .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)