Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

[Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, <ji...@apache.org> wrote:

> Author: jim
> Date: Thu Sep 17 14:39:29 2009
> New Revision: 816217
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev
> Log:
> Using apr-util
>
> Modified:
>    apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c
>

apr/locks using the still-separate apr-util just seems hokey/totally
unexpected and brings in a surprising dependency

are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?
> 
> No, my previous attempts were successfully vetoed, for good justifications.
> 
> That was why I answered Neil that it is never intentional to have apr
> dependencies upon apr-util.

Actually I just remembered, it was apr_generate_random_bytes and the os
entropy questions that bit us last time :)

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, <jim@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Author: jim
>     Date: Thu Sep 17 14:39:29 2009
>     New Revision: 816217
> 
>     URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev
>     <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev>
>     Log:
>     Using apr-util
> 
>     Modified:
>        apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c
> 
> 
> apr/locks using the still-separate apr-util just seems hokey/totally
> unexpected and brings in a surprising dependency
> 
> are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?

No, my previous attempts were successfully vetoed, for good justifications.

That was why I answered Neil that it is never intentional to have apr
dependencies upon apr-util.

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

[Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>]

Hi,
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
> At least netware does... apr_ldap_rebind_init which
> is in apu... looking for more.
yes, thats probably because we did never split apr/apr-util into
separate libs but shipped all the time an aprlib which has apr-util
linked in statically; and I think it doesnt make much sense to break
this up now when we look at the future apr-2.0 which has them combined
anyway.

Gün.

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Thu Sep 17 14:39:29 2009
>> New Revision: 816217
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Using apr-util
>>
>> Modified:
>>   apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c
>>
>> apr/locks using the still-separate apr-util just seems hokey/ 
>> totally unexpected and brings in a surprising dependency
>>
>> are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?
>>
>
> I'm looking into that...

At least netware does... apr_ldap_rebind_init which
is in apu... looking for more.

Re: svn commit: r816217 - /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Thu Sep 17 14:39:29 2009
> New Revision: 816217
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev
> Log:
> Using apr-util
>
> Modified:
>    apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c
>
> apr/locks using the still-separate apr-util just seems hokey/totally  
> unexpected and brings in a surprising dependency
>
> are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?
>

I'm looking into that... Agreed about the "should APR expect APU"
question; it's a good one.