You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/10/01 23:24:07 UTC
Re: Can we male SQLQueryBuilder less verbose?
Where were the m2 tranql artifacts published too? I only see one
artifact in http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/tranql/ (and
the Parent pom)... where is the rest of it?
I'd still like to update G to use the m2 artifacts.... and if we are
going to release this puppy soonish we are gonna need some non-
SNAPSHOT artifacts for tranql.
Any idea what's going on with the restructure and m2 work for tranql?
--jason
On Sep 15, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Looks Gianny applied some changes to the 1.4 version of tranql in
> trunk.
>
> I just pushed an updated SNAPSHOT out to the Codehaus repo.
>
> Let me know if there is an issue.
>
> On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Were you able to push a release out?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
>>
>>> The log level is now debug. I now need to investigate how to
>>> deploy the artifact (I have not done that since the "new" CodeHaus).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gianny
>>>
>>> On 13/09/2006, at 5:53 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> These types of logs don't look like they should be at INFO:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>> [INFO] 00:32:52,489 INFO [SQLQueryBuilder] CMP [Entity logical
>>>> name=[SimpleCMPEntity]; physical name=[SimpleCMP]] - [Finder
>>>> method=[findByPrimaryKey]; EJB-QL=[null]] compiled to
>>>> [JDBCQueryCommand sql=[SELECT S.id FROM SimpleCMP S WHERE S.id
>>>> = ?]]
>>>> </snip>
>>>>
>>>> Can we make these DEBUG instead?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>