You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by jh...@apache.org on 2014/09/10 07:27:44 UTC
svn commit: r1623905 -
/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
Author: jhardin
Date: Wed Sep 10 05:27:44 2014
New Revision: 1623905
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1623905
Log:
more FP avoidance tuning
Modified:
spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf?rev=1623905&r1=1623904&r2=1623905&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf (original)
+++ spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_experimental.cf Wed Sep 10 05:27:44 2014
@@ -283,12 +283,11 @@ describe __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN To: usernam
# __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN recent S/O is 0.992 on a large corpus
# with most hits at <= 5 points
# let's see if we can get those low-scored spams some more points
-# FP observation: __TO_EQ_FROM overlaps ~60% of _USER_NN ham hits;
+# FP observation: __TO_EQ_FROM_USR overlaps ~99% of _USER_NN ham hits and no spam;
# this suggests the primary spam indicator is having *different* suffixes
-# Unfortunately the spam % for that can hit 10%
# Many of the rest are fairly reliable ham indicators
# suggested scored FP avoidance rule:
-meta __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN_MINFP __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN && !__TO_EQ_FROM && !__LCL__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH && !__DKIM_EXISTS && !__NOT_SPOOFED && !__RCD_RDNS_SMTP && !__RCD_RDNS_MX_MESSY && !__THREADED
+meta __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN_MINFP __TO_EQ_FROM_USR_NN && !__TO_EQ_FROM_USR && !__TO_EQ_FROM && !__LCL__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH && !__DKIM_EXISTS && !__NOT_SPOOFED && !__RCD_RDNS_SMTP && !__RCD_RDNS_MX_MESSY && !__THREADED
header __SUBJ_NOT_SHORT Subject =~ /^.{16}/