You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Bedin, Guilherme (R&D Brazil)" <gu...@hp.com> on 2006/12/06 19:14:06 UTC
flow-map 1.1
Hi,
I have been developing modifications on fop-0.25 to suite our need
for a couple of years. And now we are trying to move on and start to use
fop-0.92.
To start, I am trying to implement fo:flow-map support on the 0.92 code
(I am using the code from 11/23/2006).
Attached is a diff from fop-0.92 implementing fo:flow-map support and
one example. How is the process to integrate it?
I notice that fop-0.92 only supports static-content for side regions and
one region-body with one flow. To use all the power of a flow-map we
need support more than one flow for one region-body, multiple
region-body and one or more flows on the side regions.
I want to known if someone has any idea on how to implement these things
in the current FOP approach? Is it difficult/possible?
Cheers,
Guilherme Bedin
Re: flow-map 1.1
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Bedin, Guilherme (R&D Brazil) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been developing modifications on fop-0.25 to suite our need
> for a couple of years. And now we are trying to move on and start to use
> fop-0.92.
> To start, I am trying to implement fo:flow-map support on the 0.92 code
> (I am using the code from 11/23/2006).
>
> Attached is a diff from fop-0.92 implementing fo:flow-map support and
> one example. How is the process to integrate it?
Thanks for the Patch. The process to get it applied is documented here:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html#patches
>
> I notice that fop-0.92 only supports static-content for side regions and
> one region-body with one flow. To use all the power of a flow-map we
> need support more than one flow for one region-body, multiple
> region-body and one or more flows on the side regions.
Yes I agree. Full support for Flow Maps would be a great addition to FOP :)
>
> I want to known if someone has any idea on how to implement these things
> in the current FOP approach? Is it difficult/possible?
I'll let one of the more active developers answer this.
Chris