You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/19 17:59:20 UTC
Vote results and further actions on graduation
Hello all,
72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
6 Binding +1 votes
5 Non-binding +1 votes
0 +0 votes
1 Binding -1 votes
1 Non-binding -1 votes
Binding +1 votes from:
Andrew Jaquith
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
Florian Holeczek
Harry Metske
Dirk Frederecick
Janne Jalkannen
Non-binding +1 votes from:
Michael Gerzabek
Christophe Dupriez
Jürgen Weber
Siegfried Goeschl
Luca Gilardoni
Binding -1 votes from:
Sam Ruby
Non-binding -1 from:
Ross Gardler
Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although
they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
these issues have been fixed, namely:
a) making (at least) one apache official release,
b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
graduation.
So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The
only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we
have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
[VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more
to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is
the general feeling.
My suggested steps would be:
- turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
way
- at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
some mock-ups on this)
- approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
- once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval,
proceed with IPMC vote
So, what do you think?
regards,
juan pablo
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
Juan Pablo,
me too agreed on all points.
I had a look at the draft, and have no further comments.
kind regards,
Harry
2012/4/19 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>
> Hello all,
>
> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
>
> 6 Binding +1 votes
> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> 0 +0 votes
> 1 Binding -1 votes
> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
>
> Binding +1 votes from:
> Andrew Jaquith
> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> Florian Holeczek
> Harry Metske
> Dirk Frederecick
> Janne Jalkannen
>
> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> Michael Gerzabek
> Christophe Dupriez
> Jürgen Weber
> Siegfried Goeschl
> Luca Gilardoni
>
> Binding -1 votes from:
> Sam Ruby
>
> Non-binding -1 from:
> Ross Gardler
>
> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
>
> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
>
> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although
> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
>
> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> graduation.
>
> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The
> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we
> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more
> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
>
> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is
> the general feeling.
>
> My suggested steps would be:
> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
> way
> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> some mock-ups on this)
> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval,
> proceed with IPMC vote
>
> So, what do you think?
>
>
> regards,
> juan pablo
>
>
> [1]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [2]
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
>
>
> I'm adding a changes.txt file with the JIRA issues
>
just have thought of it, better not to do it this time, so src can be
compared against the tag.
apologies for the noise.
--jp
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
great! :-)
I'm adding a changes.txt file with the JIRA issues for that version and
then run a vote on releasing 2.9.0-incubating-0
regards,
juan pablo
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> The svn tag is jspwiki_2_9_0 and the signed release artifacts are at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>
> /Janne
>
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 16:06 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk
> >
> >
> > thanks heaps! :-)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What's the svn tag?
> >>
> >> /Janne
> >>
> >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into
> the
> >>> WOT", which currently I don't have.
> >>>
> >>> I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
> >>> 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc
> >> of
> >>> JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> juan pablo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> >>> <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache
> web-of-trust.
> >>>>
> >>>> /Janne
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Juan Pablo,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
> >>>> notice if anything was incorrect.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join
> the
> >>>> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
> >>>> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to
> >> instructions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Florian
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
> >>>>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 6 Binding +1 votes
> >>>>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> >>>>> 0 +0 votes
> >>>>> 1 Binding -1 votes
> >>>>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binding +1 votes from:
> >>>>> Andrew Jaquith
> >>>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> >>>>> Florian Holeczek
> >>>>> Harry Metske
> >>>>> Dirk Frederecick
> >>>>> Janne Jalkannen
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> >>>>> Michael Gerzabek
> >>>>> Christophe Dupriez
> >>>>> Jürgen Weber
> >>>>> Siegfried Goeschl
> >>>>> Luca Gilardoni
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binding -1 votes from:
> >>>>> Sam Ruby
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Non-binding -1 from:
> >>>>> Ross Gardler
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
> >>>> although
> >>>>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting
> >> until
> >>>>> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> >>>>> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> >>>>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> >>>>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> >>>>> graduation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> >>>>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as
> passed.
> >>>> The
> >>>>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again,
> once
> >>>> we
> >>>>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning
> >> the
> >>>>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> >>>>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4
> were
> >>>>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> >>>>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they
> were
> >>>> more
> >>>>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> >>>>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know
> which
> >>>> is
> >>>>> the general feeling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My suggested steps would be:
> >>>>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the
> >> ASF
> >>>>> way
> >>>>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already
> have
> >>>>> some mock-ups on this)
> >>>>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or
> changes
> >>>>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> >>>>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
> >>>> approval,
> >>>>> proceed with IPMC vote
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, what do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
The svn tag is jspwiki_2_9_0 and the signed release artifacts are at
http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
/Janne
On Apr 22, 2012, at 16:06 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk
>
>
> thanks heaps! :-)
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> What's the svn tag?
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the
>>> WOT", which currently I don't have.
>>>
>>> I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
>>> 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc
>> of
>>> JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> juan pablo
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>> <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>>
>>>> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Juan Pablo,
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
>>>> notice if anything was incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the
>>>> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
>>>> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to
>> instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
>>>>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 6 Binding +1 votes
>>>>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
>>>>> 0 +0 votes
>>>>> 1 Binding -1 votes
>>>>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
>>>>>
>>>>> Binding +1 votes from:
>>>>> Andrew Jaquith
>>>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>>>>> Florian Holeczek
>>>>> Harry Metske
>>>>> Dirk Frederecick
>>>>> Janne Jalkannen
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-binding +1 votes from:
>>>>> Michael Gerzabek
>>>>> Christophe Dupriez
>>>>> Jürgen Weber
>>>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>>> Luca Gilardoni
>>>>>
>>>>> Binding -1 votes from:
>>>>> Sam Ruby
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-binding -1 from:
>>>>> Ross Gardler
>>>>>
>>>>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
>>>>>
>>>>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
>>>> although
>>>>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting
>> until
>>>>> these issues have been fixed, namely:
>>>>> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
>>>>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
>>>>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
>>>>>
>>>>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
>>>>> graduation.
>>>>>
>>>>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
>>>>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed.
>>>> The
>>>>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once
>>>> we
>>>>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning
>> the
>>>>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
>>>>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
>>>>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
>>>>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were
>>>> more
>>>>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
>>>>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which
>>>> is
>>>>> the general feeling.
>>>>>
>>>>> My suggested steps would be:
>>>>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the
>> ASF
>>>>> way
>>>>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
>>>>> some mock-ups on this)
>>>>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
>>>>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
>>>>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
>>>> approval,
>>>>> proceed with IPMC vote
>>>>>
>>>>> So, what do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> [2]
>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/trunk
thanks heaps! :-)
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> What's the svn tag?
>
> /Janne
>
> On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the
> > WOT", which currently I don't have.
> >
> > I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
> > 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc
> of
> > JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > juan pablo
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
> >>
> >> /Janne
> >>
> >> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Juan Pablo,
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
> >>>
> >>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
> >> notice if anything was incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the
> >> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
> >> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to
> instructions.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Florian
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
> >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
> >>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
> >>>
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
> >>>
> >>> 6 Binding +1 votes
> >>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> >>> 0 +0 votes
> >>> 1 Binding -1 votes
> >>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
> >>>
> >>> Binding +1 votes from:
> >>> Andrew Jaquith
> >>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> >>> Florian Holeczek
> >>> Harry Metske
> >>> Dirk Frederecick
> >>> Janne Jalkannen
> >>>
> >>> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> >>> Michael Gerzabek
> >>> Christophe Dupriez
> >>> Jürgen Weber
> >>> Siegfried Goeschl
> >>> Luca Gilardoni
> >>>
> >>> Binding -1 votes from:
> >>> Sam Ruby
> >>>
> >>> Non-binding -1 from:
> >>> Ross Gardler
> >>>
> >>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
> >>>
> >>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
> >>>
> >>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
> >> although
> >>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting
> until
> >>> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> >>> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> >>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> >>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
> >>>
> >>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> >>> graduation.
> >>>
> >>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> >>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed.
> >> The
> >>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once
> >> we
> >>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning
> the
> >>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> >>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> >>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> >>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were
> >> more
> >>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
> >>>
> >>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> >>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which
> >> is
> >>> the general feeling.
> >>>
> >>> My suggested steps would be:
> >>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the
> ASF
> >>> way
> >>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> >>> some mock-ups on this)
> >>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> >>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> >>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
> >> approval,
> >>> proceed with IPMC vote
> >>>
> >>> So, what do you think?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> juan pablo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
What's the svn tag?
/Janne
On Apr 21, 2012, at 20:30 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the
> WOT", which currently I don't have.
>
> I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
> 2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc of
> JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
>
>
> regards,
> juan pablo
>
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Juan Pablo,
>>>
>>> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
>>>
>>> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
>> notice if anything was incorrect.
>>>
>>> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the
>> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
>> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to instructions.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Florian
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
>>> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
>>>
>>> 6 Binding +1 votes
>>> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
>>> 0 +0 votes
>>> 1 Binding -1 votes
>>> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
>>>
>>> Binding +1 votes from:
>>> Andrew Jaquith
>>> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>>> Florian Holeczek
>>> Harry Metske
>>> Dirk Frederecick
>>> Janne Jalkannen
>>>
>>> Non-binding +1 votes from:
>>> Michael Gerzabek
>>> Christophe Dupriez
>>> Jürgen Weber
>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>> Luca Gilardoni
>>>
>>> Binding -1 votes from:
>>> Sam Ruby
>>>
>>> Non-binding -1 from:
>>> Ross Gardler
>>>
>>> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
>>>
>>> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
>>>
>>> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
>> although
>>> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
>>> these issues have been fixed, namely:
>>> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
>>> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
>>> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
>>>
>>> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
>>> graduation.
>>>
>>> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
>>> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed.
>> The
>>> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once
>> we
>>> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
>>> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
>>> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
>>> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
>>> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were
>> more
>>> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
>>>
>>> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
>>> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which
>> is
>>> the general feeling.
>>>
>>> My suggested steps would be:
>>> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
>>> way
>>> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
>>> some mock-ups on this)
>>> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
>>> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
>>> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
>> approval,
>>> proceed with IPMC vote
>>>
>>> So, what do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> juan pablo
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
according to [1], "any key used to sign a release should be tied into the
WOT", which currently I don't have.
I've just made a small commit just to rename 2.9.0-svn-9 as
2.9.0-incubating-0, so Janne, if you want to sign the very first asf rc of
JSPWiki in order to vote and release it, it would be very welcome :-)
regards,
juan pablo
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-560?focusedCommentId=12722790&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12722790
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
>
> /Janne
>
> On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>
> > Hi Juan Pablo,
> >
> > I agree with you in every point of your mail.
> >
> > @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give
> notice if anything was incorrect.
> >
> > Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the
> Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn
> repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to instructions.
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
> >
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
> > Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
> >
> > 6 Binding +1 votes
> > 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> > 0 +0 votes
> > 1 Binding -1 votes
> > 1 Non-binding -1 votes
> >
> > Binding +1 votes from:
> > Andrew Jaquith
> > Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> > Florian Holeczek
> > Harry Metske
> > Dirk Frederecick
> > Janne Jalkannen
> >
> > Non-binding +1 votes from:
> > Michael Gerzabek
> > Christophe Dupriez
> > Jürgen Weber
> > Siegfried Goeschl
> > Luca Gilardoni
> >
> > Binding -1 votes from:
> > Sam Ruby
> >
> > Non-binding -1 from:
> > Ross Gardler
> >
> > Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
> >
> > Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
> >
> > Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people,
> although
> > they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
> > these issues have been fixed, namely:
> > a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> > b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> > c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
> >
> > The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> > graduation.
> >
> > So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> > general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed.
> The
> > only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once
> we
> > have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
> > [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> > guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> > released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> > distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were
> more
> > to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
> >
> > I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> > graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which
> is
> > the general feeling.
> >
> > My suggested steps would be:
> > - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
> > way
> > - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> > some mock-ups on this)
> > - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> > during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> > - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on
> approval,
> > proceed with IPMC vote
> >
> > So, what do you think?
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > juan pablo
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > [2]
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>.
If need be, I've got a valid GPG key that's in the Apache web-of-trust.
/Janne
On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hi Juan Pablo,
>
> I agree with you in every point of your mail.
>
> @all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give notice if anything was incorrect.
>
> Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to instructions.
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
> Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
>
> Hello all,
>
> 72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
>
> 6 Binding +1 votes
> 5 Non-binding +1 votes
> 0 +0 votes
> 1 Binding -1 votes
> 1 Non-binding -1 votes
>
> Binding +1 votes from:
> Andrew Jaquith
> Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
> Florian Holeczek
> Harry Metske
> Dirk Frederecick
> Janne Jalkannen
>
> Non-binding +1 votes from:
> Michael Gerzabek
> Christophe Dupriez
> Jürgen Weber
> Siegfried Goeschl
> Luca Gilardoni
>
> Binding -1 votes from:
> Sam Ruby
>
> Non-binding -1 from:
> Ross Gardler
>
> Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
>
> Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
>
> Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although
> they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
> these issues have been fixed, namely:
> a) making (at least) one apache official release,
> b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
> c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
>
> The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
> graduation.
>
> So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
> general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The
> only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we
> have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
> [VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
> guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
> released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
> distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more
> to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
>
> I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
> graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is
> the general feeling.
>
> My suggested steps would be:
> - turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
> way
> - at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
> some mock-ups on this)
> - approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
> during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
> - once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval,
> proceed with IPMC vote
>
> So, what do you think?
>
>
> regards,
> juan pablo
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [2]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Re: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
Hi Juan Pablo,
I agree with you in every point of your mail.
@all: Please have a look at the current draft of our charter and give notice if anything was incorrect.
Juan Pablo, is there any chance you create a code signing key, join the Apache web of trust and add the pubkey to the KEYS file in the svn repository? Have a look at [1] for an overview and links to instructions.
Regards
Florian
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@gmail.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:59:20
Betreff: Vote results and further actions on graduation
Hello all,
72 hours have passed, and the vote totals are:
6 Binding +1 votes
5 Non-binding +1 votes
0 +0 votes
1 Binding -1 votes
1 Non-binding -1 votes
Binding +1 votes from:
Andrew Jaquith
Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
Florian Holeczek
Harry Metske
Dirk Frederecick
Janne Jalkannen
Non-binding +1 votes from:
Michael Gerzabek
Christophe Dupriez
Jürgen Weber
Siegfried Goeschl
Luca Gilardoni
Binding -1 votes from:
Sam Ruby
Non-binding -1 from:
Ross Gardler
Related jspwiki-dev threads: [1], [2]
Based on this I understand that the vote has passed, BUT:
Some issues have been raised in general@incubator, and 4 people, although
they haven't voted -1, felt it would be wise to withdraw the voting until
these issues have been fixed, namely:
a) making (at least) one apache official release,
b) placing an unvoted artifact into distribution
c) tidying up the project's incubator site,
The first and the second one being showstoppers (JSPWIKI-540) towards
graduation.
So we need to decide (as soon as possible, in order to translate to
general@incubation) if we withdraw the voting or accept it as passed. The
only dire consequence would be the need of casting the vote again, once we
have made an ASF release, which we have to do anyway: When beginning the
[VOTE] thread I stated that 2 releases were made following Apache
guidelines, but it turns out that I was mistaken - 2.8.3 and 2.8.4 were
released following apache *voting* guidelines, but they were neither
distributed the apache way, nor gpg-signed, for instance. So they were more
to be considered "Release candidates" rather than "ASF releases".
I'm inclined to withdraw + recast community vote, so we go through
graduation "the ASF way", from beginning to end, but I don't know which is
the general feeling.
My suggested steps would be:
- turn JSPWiki 2.9.0-svn-9 into 2.9.0-incubating-0 and release it the ASF
way
- at the same time tide up the project's incubator site (I already have
some mock-ups on this)
- approve the charter, that is, if there aren't any comments or changes
during this week, mark as resolved JSPWIKI-538
- once all the above is complete, recast community vote, and, on approval,
proceed with IPMC vote
So, what do you think?
regards,
juan pablo
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6Yq5oqMw9nQ4JyVR9FOsEvJCO3WFj-1GBY0rgkbvyhSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jspwiki-dev/201204.mbox/%3CCAMufup6fG8TVS10S5hwsp3VYPKLzGi41519n06pZRfmt-QSChg%40mail.gmail.com%3E