You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com> on 2009/05/01 18:39:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Folks,
I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
Specification[1].
The staging area can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
Cheers,
Eoghan
[1] See RFC 119 in http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Dan, should be sorted in this latest commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772302&view=rev
/Eoghan
2009/5/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Pretty close. Just mentioned on IRC that the source distro needs the
> LICENSE/NOTICE things. Other than that, looks much better.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed May 6 2009 9:10:18 am Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>> >
>> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
>> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
>> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>>
>> I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and
>> pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/
>>main/release/README?view=markup
>>
>> I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev
>>
>> So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>> >
>> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
>> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
>> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>> >
>> > Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
>> > "uhh..... what do I do with this?" We definitely need a readme in
>> > there to describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site,
>> > the users@ list for questions, etc.....
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
>> >> Hi Dan,
>> >>
>> >> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
>> >> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
>> >> documentation is available here:
>> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
>> >> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
>> >> greeter sample:
>> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
>> >> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
>> >> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
>> >> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
>> >> artefacts in maven.
>> >>
>> >> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
>> >> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
>> >> this should hold up the release.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this makes sense to you,
>> >>
>> >> David
>> >>
>> >> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>> >> > I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed
>> >> > out:
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that
>> >> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the
>> >> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a
>> >> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
>> >> > tag. That would also go into dist.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example:
>> >> > DOSGi doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not
>> >> > major, but if a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
>> >> >
>> >> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at
>> >> > least the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it.
>> >> > See the LICENSE in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do
>> >> > that, I may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my
>> >> > backlog of email. :-( )
>> >> >
>> >> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples,
>> >> > possible a readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal
>> >> > either way, but a bit strange.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> >> >> Folks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
>> >> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
>> >> >> Specification[1].
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The staging area can be found at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Eoghan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
>> >> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daniel Kulp
>> >> > dkulp@apache.org
>> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Pretty close. Just mentioned on IRC that the source distro needs the
LICENSE/NOTICE things. Other than that, looks much better.
Thanks!
Dan
On Wed May 6 2009 9:10:18 am Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
> >
> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>
> I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and
> pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/
>main/release/README?view=markup
>
> I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev
>
> So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
> >
> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
> >
> > Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
> > "uhh..... what do I do with this?" We definitely need a readme in
> > there to describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site,
> > the users@ list for questions, etc.....
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
> >> Hi Dan,
> >>
> >> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
> >> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
> >> documentation is available here:
> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
> >> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
> >> greeter sample:
> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
> >> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
> >> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
> >> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
> >> artefacts in maven.
> >>
> >> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
> >> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
> >> this should hold up the release.
> >>
> >> Hope this makes sense to you,
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> >> > I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed
> >> > out:
> >> >
> >> > 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that
> >> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the
> >> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a
> >> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
> >> > tag. That would also go into dist.
> >> >
> >> > 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example:
> >> > DOSGi doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not
> >> > major, but if a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
> >> >
> >> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at
> >> > least the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it.
> >> > See the LICENSE in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do
> >> > that, I may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my
> >> > backlog of email. :-( )
> >> >
> >> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples,
> >> > possible a readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal
> >> > either way, but a bit strange.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >> >> Folks,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> >> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> >> >> Specification[1].
> >> >>
> >> >> The staging area can be found at:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
> >> >>
> >> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
> >> >>
> >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Eoghan
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
> >> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Kulp
> >> > dkulp@apache.org
> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>
> OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>
> However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to the
> walkthroughs and such on the website.
I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and
pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/main/release/README?view=markup
I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev
So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release.
Cheers,
Eoghan
2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>
> OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>
> However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to the
> walkthroughs and such on the website.
>
> Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
> "uhh..... what do I do with this?" We definitely need a readme in there to
> describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site, the users@
> list for questions, etc.....
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
>> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
>> documentation is available here:
>> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
>> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
>> greeter sample:
>> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
>> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
>> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
>> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
>> artefacts in maven.
>>
>> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
>> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
>> this should hold up the release.
>>
>> Hope this makes sense to you,
>>
>> David
>>
>> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>> > I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed out:
>> >
>> > 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that
>> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the
>> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a
>> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
>> > tag. That would also go into dist.
>> >
>> > 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example: DOSGi
>> > doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not major, but if
>> > a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
>> >
>> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at least
>> > the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it. See
>> > the LICENSE in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do that, I
>> > may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my backlog of
>> > email. :-( )
>> >
>> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples, possible
>> > a readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal either way, but a
>> > bit strange.
>> >
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> >> Folks,
>> >>
>> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>> >>
>> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
>> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
>> >> Specification[1].
>> >>
>> >> The staging area can be found at:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>> >>
>> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>> >>
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>> >>
>> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Eoghan
>> >>
>> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
>> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to the
walkthroughs and such on the website.
Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
"uhh..... what do I do with this?" We definitely need a readme in there to
describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site, the users@
list for questions, etc.....
Dan
On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
> documentation is available here:
> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
> greeter sample:
> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
> artefacts in maven.
>
> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
> this should hold up the release.
>
> Hope this makes sense to you,
>
> David
>
> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> > I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed out:
> >
> > 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that
> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the
> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a
> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
> > tag. That would also go into dist.
> >
> > 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example: DOSGi
> > doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not major, but if
> > a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
> >
> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at least
> > the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it. See
> > the LICENSE in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do that, I
> > may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my backlog of
> > email. :-( )
> >
> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples, possible
> > a readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal either way, but a
> > bit strange.
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
> >>
> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> >> Specification[1].
> >>
> >> The staging area can be found at:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
> >>
> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
> >>
> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Eoghan
> >>
> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan,
On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
documentation is available here:
http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
greeter sample:
http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
artefacts in maven.
There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
this should hold up the release.
Hope this makes sense to you,
David
2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
>
> I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed out:
>
> 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that staging
> area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the mutimodule bundle,
> but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a tar.gz or zip of a "source"
> distribution of the whole contents of the tag. That would also go into
> dist.
>
> 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example: DOSGi
> doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not major, but if a
> build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
>
> 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at least the
> pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it. See the LICENSE
> in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do that, I may be able to
> help out tomorrow if I get out from under my backlog of email. :-( )
>
> 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples, possible a
> readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal either way, but a bit
> strange.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>>
>> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
>> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
>> Specification[1].
>>
>> The staging area can be found at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>>
>> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>> [1] See RFC 119 in http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Fwd: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Sent this earlier to dkulp individually, I meant to reply-all.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
Date: 2009/5/5 10:13
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
To: Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> On Mon May 4 2009 5:30:49 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>> On issue #4, I'm of a mind to just pull in the samples bundles
>> directly in from maven. This is especially convenient when using the
>> Pax URL mvn protocol, allowing a mvn:groupId:artifactId:version style
>> of URL to referenced directly from the OSGi shell. This would be the
>> most natural approach for SMX4 in any case (BTW I'm planning to wrap
>> dOSGi up as a couple of SMX4 features, which would add another layer
>> of convenience).
>
> Well, part of the purpose of a "sample" is to provide the CODE for the sample
> so they can see how it works, modify it, learn from it, etc... Pulling the
> existing stuff from maven kind of defeats that purpose, does it not?
Well no, I wouldn't say it defeats the purpose. The demo is described
in a very detailed walkthrough on the wiki[1] with links into SVN for
browsing the code. I think this is sufficient for understanding and
learning etc.
Note the dOSGi samples are a bit different from the core CXF demos in
that the emphasis is on the simplicity of enabling pre-existing OSGi
code for distribution. So the actual application code is really of
secondary importance. The crucial thing is the few knobs that need to
be set in order to transparently expose or consume an OSGi service as
a remote web service.
Cheers,
Eoghan
[1] http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed out:
1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that staging
area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the mutimodule bundle,
but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a tar.gz or zip of a "source"
distribution of the whole contents of the tag. That would also go into
dist.
2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example: DOSGi
doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not major, but if a
build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at least the
pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it. See the LICENSE
in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do that, I may be able to
help out tomorrow if I get out from under my backlog of email. :-( )
4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples, possible a
readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal either way, but a bit
strange.
Dan
On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> Specification[1].
>
> The staging area can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>
> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> [1] See RFC 119 in http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@progress.com>.
+1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eoghan Glynn" <eo...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@cxf.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 5:39 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> Specification[1].
>
> The staging area can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>
> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> [1] See RFC 119 in http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Posted by da...@apache.org.
+1
David
2009/5/1 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>:
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> Specification[1].
>
> The staging area can be found at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>
> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> [1] See RFC 119 in http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
>