You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/08/05 22:25:34 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22148] New: -
make the byte-for-byte compairson of files optional on the selector
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22148>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22148
make the byte-for-byte compairson of files optional on the <different> selector
Summary: make the byte-for-byte compairson of files optional on
the <different> selector
Product: Ant
Version: 1.6Alpha (nightly)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: Core tasks
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: daniel.armbrust@mayo.edu
The new <different> selector works like this, according to the documentation:
1. If there is no 'other' file, it's different.
2. Files with different lengths are different.
3. If ignoreFileTimes is turned off, then differing file timestamps will cause
files to be regarded as different.
4. Finally a byte-for-byte check is run against the two files
A byte for byte compairson is far to slow to use for copying large amounts of
files across a network connection. I was going to propose that we add a new
step after 3 that would do an MD5 compairson, and then make step 4 optional but
then realized that you have to read the whole file to compute an MD5. So that
wouldn't really help.
So I would like to ask that step 4 be made optional, so that when we can avoid
the time expense of comparing the files if necessary.
Also, could this be done before 1.6 goes final?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org