You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "SIBISH BASHEER (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/16 03:34:18 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (LOG4J2-777) logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

SIBISH BASHEER closed LOG4J2-777.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Duplicate

> logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-777
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: SIBISH BASHEER
>
> Hi log4j2 Team,
> If you remember, i had developed a custom logger for splunk based on log4j2 and had presented to my architects. Unfortunately they have shot down log4j2 with a weird reason that log4j author recommended logback than log4j2.
> Do you have any idea where such a strong opinion is coming from? And what response i should be giving. Also who exactly is the key author of log4j and logback? Is he the same?
> Thanks
> Sibish



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org