You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/28 09:40:55 UTC
Re: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-3583) [classlib][awt] Font library
contribution
Thanks, Mark :)
Alexey
2009/10/28 Mark Hindess (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
>
> Mark Hindess closed HARMONY-3583.
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> Closing. Alexey contributed this and applied the patch so I think waiting for verification is unnecessary. ;-)
>
>
>> [classlib][awt] Font library contribution
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: HARMONY-3583
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3583
>> Project: Harmony
>> Issue Type: New Feature
>> Components: Classlib, Contributions
>> Reporter: Alexey Petrenko
>> Assignee: Alexey Petrenko
>> Attachments: fontlib.zip, gcc-4.1-compile-fix.diff
>>
>>
>> Font library contribution on behalf of Intel Corpoartion.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
Re: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-3583) [classlib][awt] Font library contribution
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <c3...@mail.gmail.com>,
Alexey Petrenko writes:
>
> 2009/10/28 Mark Hindess (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
> >
> > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
> >
> > Mark Hindess closed HARMONY-3583.
> > ---------------------------------
> > Closing. Alexey contributed this and applied the patch so I think
> > waiting for verification is unnecessary. ;-)
>
> Thanks, Mark :)
I realised the moment I submitted this that actually you probably
intented for me to verify the compiler patch was applied rather than
that you verify your own contributiuon. Serves me right for not
creating a sub-task to avoid confusion (though I suspect I've only
confusing myself in this case ;-).
Anyway, verified now! ;-)
Regards,
Mark.