WWW Form Bug Report: "Can I have multiple 'require' clauses in access.conf ?" on Solaris 2.x (fwd)

[Rob Hartill <ro...@imdb.com>]

not acked. What is the answer ?

----- Forwarded message from chris@xopen.org -----

From: chris@xopen.org
To: apache-bugs%apache.org@organic.com
Date: Wed Nov 13  8:34:55 1996
Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "Can I have multiple 'require' clauses in access.conf ?" on Solaris 2.x

Submitter: chris@xopen.org
Operating system: Solaris 2.x, version: 
Version of Apache Used: 1.1.1
Extra Modules used: 
URL exhibiting problem: 

Symptoms:
--
We need to be able to restrict access to a directory to a group AND a user.
The sytax for access.conf is not sufficienty clear as to whether this is permitted.
Tried it, of course,  and it appears to work - but I dont want to rely on a bug which might be fixed at a later date.
Perhaps we need full BNF sytax ?? :-{

Many thanks ....
--

Backtrace:
--
access.conf extract 
#############

<Directory /home/http/top/staff/value>
AuthUserFile /usr/local/etc/httpd/conf/.htpasswd
AuthGroupFile /usr/local/etc/httpd/conf/.htgroup
AuthName The Open Group
AuthType Basic
Options IncludesNoExec Indexes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
<Limit GET>
order deny,allow
require group web-togall
require valid-user m.riminton
</Limit>
</Directory>
############
--

----- End of forwarded message from chris@xopen.org -----

-- 
Rob Hartill.       Internet Movie Database Ltd.    http://www.imdb.com/