You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Tuan Nguyen Minh <tu...@GlobalCybersoft.Com> on 2007/05/30 06:06:30 UTC
Cannot delete on many-to-many relationship
Hi all,
I'm a new user of derby. I have a problem want to support:
When executing the statement
em.createQuery("delete from Subject").executeUpdate();
where Subject is in a many-to-many relationship with Book, and Subject
owns the relationship,
one expects that the corresponding entry in the SUBJECT_BOOK table would
be deleted. This
happens when bulk deleting one-to-many relationships that are mapped
with a join table, as
well as for *-to-one relationships mapped with a foreign key. It also
happens when individually
deleting objects. However, it does not happen when bulk deleting the
owning side of a many-to-many
relationship.
Thanks & best regards,
Tuan Nguyen
Re: Cannot delete on many-to-many relationship
Posted by Francois Orsini <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hello Tuan,
How are you handing referential integrity in your application? are you using
triggers or are you using referential contraints (cascade deletes) - Would
be helpful if you could post a bit more details about your data schema
definitions or/and a reproducible case...
Thanks, --francois
On 5/29/07, Tuan Nguyen Minh <tu...@globalcybersoft.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a new user of derby. I have a problem want to support:
>
> When executing the statement
>
>
>
> em.createQuery("delete from Subject").executeUpdate();
>
>
>
> where Subject is in a many-to-many relationship with Book, and Subject owns the relationship,
>
> one expects that the corresponding entry in the SUBJECT_BOOK table would be deleted. This
>
> happens when bulk deleting one-to-many relationships that are mapped with a join table, as
>
> well as for *-to-one relationships mapped with a foreign key. It also happens when individually
>
> deleting objects. However, it does not happen when bulk deleting the owning side of a many-to-many
>
> relationship.
>
>
>
> Thanks & best regards,
>
> Tuan Nguyen
>