You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by Jean Carlo <je...@gmail.com> on 2016/02/10 17:45:30 UTC
Do I have to use repair -inc with the option -par forcely?
Hi guys; The question is on the subject.
I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
I cannot permit this behaivor on my cluster in production.
*It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
repair at the same time.
Best regards
Jean Carlo
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay
Re: Do I have to use repair -inc with the option -par forcely?
Posted by Jean Carlo <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi ,
Thx @alain for you reply. Yes we have the 2.1.12. We are definitely
facing CASSANDRA-10422
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422>.
However I cannot run incremental repairs without add -par
@carlos if what you say it's correct, it will be really nice because the
process to migrate it's quite tedious if you have many nodes
Saludos
Jean Carlo
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Carlos Rolo <ro...@pythian.com> wrote:
> +1 on what Alain said, but I do think if you are high enough on a 2.1.x
> (will look later) version you don't need to follow the documentation. It is
> outdated. Run a full repair, the you can start incremental repairs since
> the SSTables will have the metadata on them about the last repair.
>
> Wait someone to confirm this/or confirm the docs are correct.
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlos Juzarte Rolo
> Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP
>
> Pythian - Love your data
>
> rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
> <http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
> Mobile: +351 91 891 81 00 | Tel: +1 613 565 8696 x1649
> www.pythian.com
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Alain RODRIGUEZ <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
>>> the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
>>
>>
>> This looks like a known issue, see
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422
>> Make sure your version is higher than 2.1.12, 2.2.4, 3.0.1, 3.1 to avoid
>> this (and you are indeed facing CASSANDRA-10422).
>> I am not sure you are facing this though, as you don't seem to be using
>> subranges (nodetool repair -st and -et options)
>>
>> *It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>>>
>>> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
>>> repair at the same time.
>>>
>>
>>
>> From http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/more-efficient-repairs
>> "Incremental repairs can be opted into via the -inc option to nodetool
>> repair. This is compatible with both sequential and parallel (-par)
>> repair, e.g., bin/nodetool -par -inc <ks> <cf>."
>> So you should be able to remove -par. Not sure this will solve your issue
>> though.
>>
>>
>> Did you respect this process to migrate to incremental repairs?
>>
>> https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.1/cassandra/operations/opsRepairNodesMigration.html#opsRepairNodesMigration__ol_dxj_gp5_2s
>>
>> C*heers,
>> -----------------
>> Alain Rodriguez
>> France
>>
>> The Last Pickle
>> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-02-10 17:45 GMT+01:00 Jean Carlo <je...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi guys; The question is on the subject.
>>>
>>> I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my
>>> nodes the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
>>>
>>> I cannot permit this behaivor on my cluster in production.
>>>
>>> *It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>>>
>>> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
>>> repair at the same time.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Jean Carlo
>>>
>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
Re: Do I have to use repair -inc with the option -par forcely?
Posted by Carlos Rolo <ro...@pythian.com>.
+1 on what Alain said, but I do think if you are high enough on a 2.1.x
(will look later) version you don't need to follow the documentation. It is
outdated. Run a full repair, the you can start incremental repairs since
the SSTables will have the metadata on them about the last repair.
Wait someone to confirm this/or confirm the docs are correct.
Regards,
Carlos Juzarte Rolo
Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP
Pythian - Love your data
rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
<http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
Mobile: +351 91 891 81 00 | Tel: +1 613 565 8696 x1649
www.pythian.com
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Alain RODRIGUEZ <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
>> the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
>
>
> This looks like a known issue, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422
> Make sure your version is higher than 2.1.12, 2.2.4, 3.0.1, 3.1 to avoid
> this (and you are indeed facing CASSANDRA-10422).
> I am not sure you are facing this though, as you don't seem to be using
> subranges (nodetool repair -st and -et options)
>
> *It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>>
>> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
>> repair at the same time.
>>
>
>
> From http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/more-efficient-repairs
> "Incremental repairs can be opted into via the -inc option to nodetool
> repair. This is compatible with both sequential and parallel (-par)
> repair, e.g., bin/nodetool -par -inc <ks> <cf>."
> So you should be able to remove -par. Not sure this will solve your issue
> though.
>
>
> Did you respect this process to migrate to incremental repairs?
>
> https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.1/cassandra/operations/opsRepairNodesMigration.html#opsRepairNodesMigration__ol_dxj_gp5_2s
>
> C*heers,
> -----------------
> Alain Rodriguez
> France
>
> The Last Pickle
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
>
>
> 2016-02-10 17:45 GMT+01:00 Jean Carlo <je...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi guys; The question is on the subject.
>>
>> I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
>> the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
>>
>> I cannot permit this behaivor on my cluster in production.
>>
>> *It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>>
>> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
>> repair at the same time.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Jean Carlo
>>
>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay
>>
>
>
--
--
Re: Do I have to use repair -inc with the option -par forcely?
Posted by Alain RODRIGUEZ <ar...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
> the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
This looks like a known issue, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10422
Make sure your version is higher than 2.1.12, 2.2.4, 3.0.1, 3.1 to avoid
this (and you are indeed facing CASSANDRA-10422).
I am not sure you are facing this though, as you don't seem to be using
subranges (nodetool repair -st and -et options)
*It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>
> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
> repair at the same time.
>
>From http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/more-efficient-repairs
"Incremental repairs can be opted into via the -inc option to nodetool
repair. This is compatible with both sequential and parallel (-par) repair,
e.g., bin/nodetool -par -inc <ks> <cf>."
So you should be able to remove -par. Not sure this will solve your issue
though.
Did you respect this process to migrate to incremental repairs?
https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.1/cassandra/operations/opsRepairNodesMigration.html#opsRepairNodesMigration__ol_dxj_gp5_2s
C*heers,
-----------------
Alain Rodriguez
France
The Last Pickle
http://www.thelastpickle.com
2016-02-10 17:45 GMT+01:00 Jean Carlo <je...@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys; The question is on the subject.
>
> I am testing repairs repairs -inc -par and I can see that in all my nodes
> the numbers of sstables explode to 5k from 5 sstables.
>
> I cannot permit this behaivor on my cluster in production.
>
> *It is anyway to run repairs incrementals but not -par ?*
>
> I know that is it not possible to run sequential repair with incremental
> repair at the same time.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jean Carlo
>
> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay
>