1.1 CHANGES entry

[Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>]

On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 17:09, sussman@tigris.org wrote:

> + * huge improvements to python, perl, java bindings
> + * huge changes to win32 build system

I know that these CHANGES points are laughable, and I apologize.  The
number of things that have happened in in the bindings since last
December are so numerous, I might argue that each sub-project should
have it's *own* changes file!

So... can folks point out just a few significant "highlights" in the
bindings and build systems... really general ones worth mentioning?  For
example, isn't the win32 build system producing DLLs now, rather than
.libs?  And aren't the java and perl bindings now fully integrated into
the build system, the way the python bindings are?





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: 1.1 CHANGES entry

[Jani Averbach <ja...@jaa.iki.fi>]

On 2004-07-13 17:51-0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> .libs?  And aren't the java and perl bindings now fully integrated into
> the build system, the way the python bindings are?
> 

with java you could do:

$ ./configure
    ...
    "--with-jdk" \
    "--with-junit=$junit_jar" \

make
make install
make javahl
make install-javahl
make check-javahl

so I would say yes for java. Very nice work.

BR, Jani

-- 
Jani Averbach


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org