You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> on 2006/03/02 07:16:47 UTC
new jar file name
I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
So far these are the proposed names:
derbycmd.jar
derbyctl.jar
derbygo.jar
derbyrun.jar
goderby.jar
runderby.jar
Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
andrew
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
So, if I tally up the contents of this thread as an informal vote, we've got:
derbyrun - 1/2 (me), 1 (John), 1/2 (Kristian), 1 (Susan), 1
(Michelle), 1/2 (Jean), 1 (Satheesh)
runderby - 1/2 (me), 1 Dan, 1/2 (Kristian), 1/2 (Jean), 1 (Dag)
That's 5 1/2 for derbyrun.jar and 3 1/2 for runderby.jar.
Unless someone really has a problem with it, I'm going to go with derbyrun.jar.
andrew
Re: new jar file name
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>>I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
>>execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
>>derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
>>
>>So far these are the proposed names:
>>
>>derbycmd.jar
>>derbyctl.jar
>>derbygo.jar
>>derbyrun.jar
>>goderby.jar
>>runderby.jar
>>
>>Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
>>
>>andrew
>
>
> I like derbyrun.jar or funderby.jar.
I like derbyrun.jar or runderby.jar. *sigh* even though it is fun.
-jean
Re: new jar file name
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
> execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
> derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
>
> So far these are the proposed names:
>
> derbycmd.jar
> derbyctl.jar
> derbygo.jar
> derbyrun.jar
> goderby.jar
> runderby.jar
>
> Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
>
> andrew
I like derbyrun.jar or funderby.jar.
-jean
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
> execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
> derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
>
> So far these are the proposed names:
>
> derbycmd.jar
> derbyctl.jar
> derbygo.jar
> derbyrun.jar
> goderby.jar
> runderby.jar
>
> Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
I like the ones where 'go' or 'run' is before derby, shows the jar has a
different purpose to the other jar files. I think I like runderby.jar
the best.
Dan.
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Michelle Caisse <Mi...@Sun.COM>.
I like derbygo.jar or derbyrun.jar. I think it's advantageous for the
derby jars to sort together.
-- Michelle
Kristian Waagan wrote:
> Rajesh Kartha wrote:
>
>> How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
>
>
> Hi Rajesh,
>
>
> 'derbyutils.jar' does not say me much. What is in there? To me it
> sounds as it contains some additional programs/tools you can use
> on/with Derby. Also, what's the difference between 'derbytools.jar'
> and 'derbyutils.jar'?
>
> Just my personal opinions :)
>
> I think I'll join in on cheering for 'runderby.jar', or possibly
> 'derbyrun.jar'.
>
>
>
> regards,
> --
> Kristian
>
>>
>> -Rajesh
>>
>> On 3/2/06, *Andrew McIntyre* <mcintyre.a@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/2/06, John Embretsen <John.Embretsen@sun.com
>> <ma...@sun.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I
>> like
>> > derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings
>> about it
>> > :)
>>
>> Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
>> functionality of the new jar file in as few characters as
>> possible, to
>> minimize typing. I'm open to suggestions, but I'd like to choose a
>> name as soon as possible.
>>
>> derbyrun.jar is also currently my favorite, but that could
>> change. ;-)
>>
>> andrew
>>
>>
>
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Kristian Waagan <Kr...@Sun.COM>.
Rajesh Kartha wrote:
> How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
Hi Rajesh,
'derbyutils.jar' does not say me much. What is in there? To me it sounds
as it contains some additional programs/tools you can use on/with Derby.
Also, what's the difference between 'derbytools.jar' and 'derbyutils.jar'?
Just my personal opinions :)
I think I'll join in on cheering for 'runderby.jar', or possibly
'derbyrun.jar'.
regards,
--
Kristian
>
> -Rajesh
>
> On 3/2/06, *Andrew McIntyre* <mcintyre.a@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/06, John Embretsen <John.Embretsen@sun.com
> <ma...@sun.com>> wrote:
> >
> > As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like
> > derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it
> > :)
>
> Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
> functionality of the new jar file in as few characters as possible, to
> minimize typing. I'm open to suggestions, but I'd like to choose a
> name as soon as possible.
>
> derbyrun.jar is also currently my favorite, but that could change. ;-)
>
> andrew
>
>
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Rajesh Kartha <ka...@gmail.com>.
How about 'derbyutils.jar' ?
-Rajesh
On 3/2/06, Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/06, John Embretsen <Jo...@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like
> > derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it
> > :)
>
> Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
> functionality of the new jar file in as few characters as possible, to
> minimize typing. I'm open to suggestions, but I'd like to choose a
> name as soon as possible.
>
> derbyrun.jar is also currently my favorite, but that could change. ;-)
>
> andrew
>
Re: new jar file name
Posted by "Dag H. Wanvik" <Da...@Sun.COM>.
Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> writes:
runderby: +1
Dag
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 3/2/06, John Embretsen <Jo...@sun.com> wrote:
>
> As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like
> derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it
> :)
Eight characters is not a requirement. The idea is to capture the
functionality of the new jar file in as few characters as possible, to
minimize typing. I'm open to suggestions, but I'd like to choose a
name as soon as possible.
derbyrun.jar is also currently my favorite, but that could change. ;-)
andrew
Re: new jar file name
Posted by John Embretsen <Jo...@Sun.COM>.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
> execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
> derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
>
> So far these are the proposed names:
>
> derbycmd.jar
> derbyctl.jar
> derbygo.jar
> derbyrun.jar
> goderby.jar
> runderby.jar
>
> Does anyone have a strong feeling for going with any of these names?
>
> andrew
As long as we have to stick to max 8 characters in the name I like
derbyrun.jar the best, although I don't have strong feelings about it
:)
--
John
Re: new jar file name
Posted by Susan Cline <ho...@pacbell.net>.
--- Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought of another possible candidate for the new jar file to
> execute the tools and network server as part of DERBY-1063:
> derbyrun.jar, which also works as runderby.jar
>
> So far these are the proposed names:
>
> derbycmd.jar
> derbyctl.jar
> derbygo.jar
> derbyrun.jar
> goderby.jar
> runderby.jar
derbyrun.jar is nice - I think it's nice to have all the names start with 'derby'
Susan