You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2009/09/25 18:43:22 UTC
Other dormant modules..
I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
activemq-soaktest
activemq-systest
activemq-protocol-buffer
activemq-book
activemq-test-atomikos
Regards,
Hiram
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>.
Definitively!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>> +1
>>
>> And would add
>>
>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>
>>> activemq-soaktest
>>> activemq-systest
>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>> activemq-book
>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>.
ok. this is done now.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok... I'll create issues for each module so that it's tracked in the
> jira change log.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> And message groups and active-blaze - for now
>>> On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>>
>>>> and even activemq-perftest. Seems we have lots of long running / sock
>>>> tests that we don't really run during the build.
>>>> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. I think it may be
>>>> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
>>>> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And would add
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>> <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>>>>>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>>>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>>>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>
>> +1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox.
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>> );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>.
ok... I'll create issues for each module so that it's tracked in the
jira change log.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And message groups and active-blaze - for now
>> On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> and even activemq-perftest. Seems we have lots of long running / sock
>>> tests that we don't really run during the build.
>>> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. I think it may be
>>> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
>>> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And would add
>>>>>>
>>>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino
>>>>>> <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>>>>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>
> +1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And message groups and active-blaze - for now
> On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>> and even activemq-perftest. Seems we have lots of long running / sock
>> tests that we don't really run during the build.
>> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. I think it may be
>> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
>> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> And would add
>>>>>
>>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino
>>>>> <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>>>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
+1 to moving all the modules listed in this thread to the sandbox.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
And message groups and active-blaze - for now
On 25 Sep 2009, at 18:07, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> and even activemq-perftest. Seems we have lots of long running / sock
> tests that we don't really run during the build.
> I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. I think it may be
> best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
> periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac
>> <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>
>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac
>>> <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> And would add
>>>>
>>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>
>>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think
>>>>> these also
>>>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could
>>>>> always
>>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up.
>>>>> Or
>>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>>
>>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>>> activemq-systest
>>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>>> activemq-book
>>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Hiram
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Hiram
>>>>>
>>>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>.
and even activemq-perftest. Seems we have lots of long running / sock
tests that we don't really run during the build.
I don't see the point of leaving these in for now. I think it may be
best to organize 1 separate module of these tests that we can
periodically execute these against any release of ActiveMQ?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>>> +1
>>>
>>> And would add
>>>
>>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>
>>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>>
>>>> activemq-soaktest
>>>> activemq-systest
>>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>>> activemq-book
>>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hiram
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>>
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>.
And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ??
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to bring that up ...
>> +1
>>
>> And would add
>>
>> activemq-camel-loadtest
>> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>>
>>> activemq-soaktest
>>> activemq-systest
>>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>>> activemq-book
>>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
and maybe activemq-repository-builder ?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Just wanted to bring that up ...
> +1
>
> And would add
>
> activemq-camel-loadtest
> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
>
>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>>
>> activemq-soaktest
>> activemq-systest
>> activemq-protocol-buffer
>> activemq-book
>> activemq-test-atomikos
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com/
>>
>
>
Re: Other dormant modules..
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Just wanted to bring that up ...
+1
And would add
activemq-camel-loadtest
and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?)
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also
> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always
> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or
> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle.
>
> activemq-soaktest
> activemq-systest
> activemq-protocol-buffer
> activemq-book
> activemq-test-atomikos
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>