You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Dürig <mi...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/15 15:46:56 UTC
Javadoc: {@code...} instead of
Hi,
What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
<code>null</code> in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
however we should use all the same format.
Michael
Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of
Posted by Angela Schreiber <an...@adobe.com>.
hi michael
> FWIW: I switched to {@code} in the org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr package
> space.
fine with me... i don't have strong feelings in either way and will
hopefully have not problem adjusting to either solution.
using a common coding style will be a good thing imo. usually i
don't wish to know the author of every single line (and if i do
i use svn blame ;)
regards
angela
> On 15.3.12 16:10, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Felix Meschberger<fm...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
>>>> <code>null</code> in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
>>>> it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
>>>> however we should use all the same format.
>>>
>>> I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the<code>...</code> style.
>>
>> same here. i realize that i am getting old;)
>> i kind of like the {@code} variant but i don't feel strong either way.
>>
>> cheers
>> stefan
>>
>>>
>>> From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different from<code>) it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html element.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Felix
Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of
Posted by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org>.
FWIW: I switched to {@code} in the org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr package
space.
Michael
On 15.3.12 16:10, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Felix Meschberger<fm...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
>>> <code>null</code> in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
>>> it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
>>> however we should use all the same format.
>>
>> I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the<code>...</code> style.
>
> same here. i realize that i am getting old;)
> i kind of like the {@code} variant but i don't feel strong either way.
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
>>
>> From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different from<code>) it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html element.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of
Posted by Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
>> <code>null</code> in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
>> it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
>> however we should use all the same format.
>
> I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the <code>...</code> style.
same here. i realize that i am getting old;)
i kind of like the {@code} variant but i don't feel strong either way.
cheers
stefan
>
> From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different from <code>) it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html element.
>
> Regards
> Felix
Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@adobe.com>.
Hi,
Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:
>
> Hi,
>
> What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
> <code>null</code> in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one since
> it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
> however we should use all the same format.
I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the <code>...</code> style.
>From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different from <code>) it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html element.
Regards
Felix