[GitHub] [lucene] mocobeta commented on pull request #284: LUCENE-10059: Additional fix to handle n_best backtrace

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

mocobeta commented on PR #284:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/284#issuecomment-1120336452

   I'm sorry for the late reply, looks good to me, thanks @jimczi !
   There are conflicts due to the recent refactoring #805, would you mind if I adjust this and merge to main?
   
   Now old `parse()` method in JapaneseTokenizer and KoreanTokenizer are integrated into `org.apache.lucene.analysis.morph.Viterbi.forward()` in analysis-common module, so this change can applied to it and we no longer maintain two `parse()` method (in main).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org