You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Matteo Merli <mm...@apache.org> on 2017/10/26 21:00:36 UTC

[DISCUSSION] Proposals for Pulsar 2.0

A part from the immediate next release, I would also start the discussion
for a more longer term changes.

Several weeks ago we discussed about changes that required some degree of
compatibility breaking, not in the APIs but rather in the
tools/configuration or in form of binary compatibility.
For these changes, we might want to do a 2.0 release, and while we're at it
we should take the opportunity to make all the changes we need.

I would like to start getting the discussion on all the proposals for these
changes and I've setup a github project for tracking purposes:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/projects/4

I would expect that getting all the changes for 2.0 might take more than
the regular ~1month release cycle. We could plan to have a 1.21/1.22 in the
middle if that becomes necessary.

What are the thoughts around this? Please, start adding tasks in the 2.0
project board and start the discussion here in the mailing list, even
though a complete design/PIP is not ready.


Matteo
-- 
Matteo Merli
<mm...@apache.org>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposals for Pulsar 2.0

Posted by 志賀 優毅 <yu...@apache.org>.
Hi,

As disucussed in #820, we want to delete authenticationEnabled setting for broker.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/820

We want to merge this PR once, release it in 1.21 or 1.22 and delete authenticationEnabled setting in 2.0 because of comapatibility breaking of a setting file.

What do you think ?

Yuki

2017/10/27 6:00 に、"Matteo Merli" <mm...@apache.org> を書き込みました:

    A part from the immediate next release, I would also start the discussion
    for a more longer term changes.
    
    Several weeks ago we discussed about changes that required some degree of
    compatibility breaking, not in the APIs but rather in the
    tools/configuration or in form of binary compatibility.
    For these changes, we might want to do a 2.0 release, and while we're at it
    we should take the opportunity to make all the changes we need.
    
    I would like to start getting the discussion on all the proposals for these
    changes and I've setup a github project for tracking purposes:
    
    https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/projects/4
    
    I would expect that getting all the changes for 2.0 might take more than
    the regular ~1month release cycle. We could plan to have a 1.21/1.22 in the
    middle if that becomes necessary.
    
    What are the thoughts around this? Please, start adding tasks in the 2.0
    project board and start the discussion here in the mailing list, even
    though a complete design/PIP is not ready.
    
    
    Matteo
    -- 
    Matteo Merli
    <mm...@apache.org>