You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by wr...@apache.org on 2013/11/12 21:47:56 UTC

svn commit: r1541228 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:47:55 2013
New Revision: 1541228

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541228
Log:
Idea to help https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh.diff w/review

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1541228&r1=1541227&r2=1541228&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Nov 12 20:47:55 2013
@@ -175,7 +175,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
                    https://svn.apache.org/r1527295
                    https://svn.apache.org/r1527926
     2.4.x patch: https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-2.4.x-ekh.diff
-    +1: kbrand,
+    +1: kbrand
+    [wrowe comments] is it possible to split the patch into 'accepted for 2.2'
+    which is straightforward to review (and commit seperately) from those
+    features 'new to 2.4'?  I think that would attract the necessary eyeballs.
 
   * mod_auth_form: Make sure the optional functions are loaded even when
     the AuthFormProvider isn't specified.