You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@shindig.apache.org by aw...@apache.org on 2009/08/04 18:27:46 UTC
svn commit: r800864 - /incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Author: awiner
Date: Tue Aug 4 16:27:46 2009
New Revision: 800864
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=800864&view=rev
Log:
Downgrade to Servlet 2.4
- This is a "provided" scoped, backwards-compatible API, and we should be using the oldest version possible
Modified:
incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml?rev=800864&r1=800863&r2=800864&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml (original)
+++ incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml Tue Aug 4 16:27:46 2009
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.servlet</groupId>
<artifactId>servlet-api</artifactId>
- <version>2.5</version>
+ <version>2.4</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
Re: svn commit: r800864 - /incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Vincent Siveton<vs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> 2009/8/6 Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
>> It'd be good to downgrade that, but it's not essential. The important
>> thing is that Shindig users know Shindig supports Servlet 2.4
>> containers (the demo .war is just not that important).
>
> From an user point of view, I think we need to be consistent 2.4 or
> 2.5. We support at least servlet 2.4.
> I am willing to add some FAQ to said that 2.4/2.5 are supported. WDYT?
Sounds good to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
Re: svn commit: r800864 - /incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vs...@apache.org>.
Hi Adam,
2009/8/6 Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
> It'd be good to downgrade that, but it's not essential. The important
> thing is that Shindig users know Shindig supports Servlet 2.4
> containers (the demo .war is just not that important).
>From an user point of view, I think we need to be consistent 2.4 or
2.5. We support at least servlet 2.4.
I am willing to add some FAQ to said that 2.4/2.5 are supported. WDYT?
Cheers,
Vincent
Re: svn commit: r800864 - /incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Vincent Siveton<vs...@apache.org> wrote:
> 2009/8/4 <aw...@apache.org>:
>> Author: awiner
>> Date: Tue Aug 4 16:27:46 2009
>> New Revision: 800864
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=800864&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Downgrade to Servlet 2.4
>> - This is a "provided" scoped, backwards-compatible API, and we should be using the oldest version possible
>
> Do we need also to use web-app_2_4.xsd in web.xml?
It'd be good to downgrade that, but it's not essential. The important
thing is that Shindig users know Shindig supports Servlet 2.4
containers (the demo .war is just not that important).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
Re: svn commit: r800864 - /incubator/shindig/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vs...@apache.org>.
2009/8/4 <aw...@apache.org>:
> Author: awiner
> Date: Tue Aug 4 16:27:46 2009
> New Revision: 800864
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=800864&view=rev
> Log:
> Downgrade to Servlet 2.4
> - This is a "provided" scoped, backwards-compatible API, and we should be using the oldest version possible
Do we need also to use web-app_2_4.xsd in web.xml?
Cheers,
Vincent