You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Donald Ball <db...@rhoworld.com> on 2002/08/27 21:16:15 UTC
mysterious log4j problem
Did something change between 1.1b1 and 1.1b2 regarding log4j behavior in
struts? It's a long shot, but it's worth asking. Our log4j debug statements
are disappearing now and the only relevant change we made was to upgrade
from 1.1b1 to 1.1b2. I grepped through the struts source and wasn't able to
find any references to log4j, but I thought I'd ask anyway...
- donald
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mysterious log4j problem
Posted by Donald Ball <db...@rhoworld.com>.
On 8/27/2002 at 3:16 PM Donald Ball wrote:
>Did something change between 1.1b1 and 1.1b2 regarding log4j behavior in
>struts? It's a long shot, but it's worth asking. Our log4j debug
statements
>are disappearing now and the only relevant change we made was to upgrade
>from 1.1b1 to 1.1b2. I grepped through the struts source and wasn't able
to
>find any references to log4j, but I thought I'd ask anyway...
Once again, never mind. The release notes on the 1.1b2 download page
explain the solution.
- donald
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mysterious log4j problem
Posted by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Donald Ball wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:54:13 -0400
> From: Donald Ball <db...@rhoworld.com>
> To: craigmcc@apache.org, struts-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mysterious log4j problem
>
> On 8/27/2002 at 12:48 PM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> >Have you heeded the comment at the bottom of the 1.1-b2 download page
> >about picking up the latest commons-logging.jar? It's in the paragraph
> >that starts with bold text "Log4J Users Please Note" :-).
>
> Nope, i was needlessly heedless. :) Thanks for the RTFM tip.
>
Someone suggested that I use the <blink> tag around that paragraph. Hmm
... :-)
> - donald
>
>
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mysterious log4j problem
Posted by Donald Ball <db...@rhoworld.com>.
On 8/27/2002 at 12:48 PM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>Have you heeded the comment at the bottom of the 1.1-b2 download page
>about picking up the latest commons-logging.jar? It's in the paragraph
>that starts with bold text "Log4J Users Please Note" :-).
Nope, i was needlessly heedless. :) Thanks for the RTFM tip.
- donald
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: mysterious log4j problem
Posted by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Donald Ball wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:16:15 -0400
> From: Donald Ball <db...@rhoworld.com>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <st...@jakarta.apache.org>,
> dball@rhoworld.com
> To: struts-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: mysterious log4j problem
>
> Did something change between 1.1b1 and 1.1b2 regarding log4j behavior in
> struts? It's a long shot, but it's worth asking. Our log4j debug statements
> are disappearing now and the only relevant change we made was to upgrade
> from 1.1b1 to 1.1b2. I grepped through the struts source and wasn't able to
> find any references to log4j, but I thought I'd ask anyway...
>
Have you heeded the comment at the bottom of the 1.1-b2 download page
about picking up the latest commons-logging.jar? It's in the paragraph
that starts with bold text "Log4J Users Please Note" :-).
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.1-b2/
> - donald
Craig
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>