You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2021/07/16 11:39:05 UTC
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
I'm ready for a dev3...
> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>> Mathias;
>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>> build.
>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>> translations.
>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>> Definitely!
>>>
>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>
>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>
> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>
>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>
> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>> 4.2.0-
>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 08.08.21 um 15:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though.
Thanks! I think they are needed when we publish builds as AOO project.
Personal builds don't...
Windows builds are also complete now!
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
>>
>> BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>>> Yep. That's right!
>>>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>>>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>>>
>>> Yikes!
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though.
> On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
>
> BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>> Yep. That's right!
>>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>>
>> Yikes!
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
Matthias
Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
> Yep. That's right!
>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>
> Yikes!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> That's c9282f5c5c ?
Yep. That's right!
>
> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>
Yikes!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
That's c9282f5c5c ?
Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
Matthias
Am 06.08.21 um 13:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-)
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Ready, when you are! ;-)
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>>
>> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
>> ============================
>> A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
>> thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
>> files' contents are not written.
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>>>
>>> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>>>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Ready, when you are! ;-)
Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>
> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
> ============================
> A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
> thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
> files' contents are not written.
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>>
>> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>>> +1
>>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
============================
A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
files' contents are not written.
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>
> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>> +1
>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
@Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi,
>
> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
> Git hash 494e99f846.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>> +1
>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi,
Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
Git hash 494e99f846.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Next weekend? Any idea?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>
>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>> +1
>> I would have time this weekend...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
Next weekend? Any idea?
Matthias
Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>
>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>> +1
> I would have time this weekend...
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello All,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Snapshot works for me
>> Great! What do others think?
>>
>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
> +1
I would have time this weekend...
Regards,
Matthias
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID>.
Hello All,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Snapshot works for me
>
> Great! What do others think?
>
> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
+1
--
Arrigo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
@Mechtilde:
Any thoughts on the translation?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 23.07.21 um 16:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
> maybe with the latest translations?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>> build.
>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>> translations.
>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>
>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>
>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>
>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Snapshot works for me
Great! What do others think?
Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
Matthias
>
>> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>> That's great!
>>
>> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
>> maybe with the latest translations?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>
>>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>>> build.
>>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>>> translations.
>>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>>
>>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>>
>>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Snapshot works for me
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
> maybe with the latest translations?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>> build.
>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>> translations.
>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>
>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>
>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>
>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I'm ready for a dev3...
That's great!
Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
maybe with the latest translations?
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>> build.
>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>> translations.
>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>> Definitely!
>>>>
>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>
>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>
>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>
>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>