You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by John Lussmyer <Co...@CasaDelGato.Com> on 2024/01/01 23:22:12 UTC

SocketCan J1939 support?

I'm trying to figure out if PLX4X SocketCan support will work with the 
J1939 variation.

i.e. create a socket like this:

s=socket(PF_CAN,SOCK_DGRAM,CAN_J1939);

If so, anyone have some example code of using the socketcan support?

Re: SocketCan J1939 support?

Posted by John Lussmyer <Co...@CasaDelGato.Com>.

I hadn't realized that PLC4X used JavaCan.  I've just been trying to 
find SOMETHING that supports CanBus J1939.
If we can get it working with JavaCan, that's likely all I'll need.

On 1/2/2024 1:31 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> Hello John,
> I think its within the reach, it does depend however on JavaCAN 
> library: https://github.com/pschichtel/JavaCAN.
> I saw you issued already a query on JavaCAN repository. Once we have a 
> data stream available the application layer can be implemented.
>
> Best,
> Łukasz
>
> On 2.01.2024 00:22, John Lussmyer wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out if PLX4X SocketCan support will work with 
>> the J1939 variation.
>>
>> i.e. create a socket like this:
>>
>> s=socket(PF_CAN,SOCK_DGRAM,CAN_J1939);
>>
>> If so, anyone have some example code of using the socketcan support?
>>
>

Re: SocketCan J1939 support?

Posted by Łukasz Dywicki <lu...@code-house.org>.

Hello John,
I think its within the reach, it does depend however on JavaCAN library: 
https://github.com/pschichtel/JavaCAN.
I saw you issued already a query on JavaCAN repository. Once we have a 
data stream available the application layer can be implemented.

Best,
Łukasz

On 2.01.2024 00:22, John Lussmyer wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if PLX4X SocketCan support will work with the 
> J1939 variation.
> 
> i.e. create a socket like this:
> 
> s=socket(PF_CAN,SOCK_DGRAM,CAN_J1939);
> 
> If so, anyone have some example code of using the socketcan support?
>