You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl> on 2013/03/11 12:18:53 UTC
[FlexJS] data structure specs
Alex,
Could you please take a look at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wondering which
one is leading...
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [FlexJS] data structure specs
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/11/13 8:27 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> The last entry for each descriptor is a 'null' and is supposed to be
> for "children", but as all child nodes in FlexJS seem to be
> implemented as 'beads', isn't the children entry obsolete?
No, there are certainly children or will be when we have containers.
>
> There is some inconsistency with regard to the final 3 (or 4, counting
> 'children') entries. The description on the is that they are for
> styles, effects and events (and children), but the implementation in
> FalconJS outputs only 2... I assume these two are 'styles' and
> 'events' (in that order) and that 'effects' is obsolete?
It should be properties and events, but I think I'm sticking in 0's for
styles and effects.
>
> That's the ones that caught my eye. As I'm "almost" ready to do a full
> one on one comparison between the output of FalconJS and FalconJx,
> maybe more will pop up.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/11/13 4:18 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> Could you please take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
>>>
>>> and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
>>> between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wondering which
>>> one is leading...
>>>
>> What difference are you seeing? BTW, the only thing that probably shouldn't
>> change is the fact that it is an array of stuff. The format of the stuff
>> can change if it needs to. Also note that you can look at what
>> Falcon/FalconJS is currently doing since it actually works (at least, well
>> enough for the prototype).
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Re: [FlexJS] data structure specs
Posted by Erik de Bruin <er...@ixsoftware.nl>.
The last entry for each descriptor is a 'null' and is supposed to be
for "children", but as all child nodes in FlexJS seem to be
implemented as 'beads', isn't the children entry obsolete?
There is some inconsistency with regard to the final 3 (or 4, counting
'children') entries. The description on the is that they are for
styles, effects and events (and children), but the implementation in
FalconJS outputs only 2... I assume these two are 'styles' and
'events' (in that order) and that 'effects' is obsolete?
That's the ones that caught my eye. As I'm "almost" ready to do a full
one on one comparison between the output of FalconJS and FalconJx,
maybe more will pop up.
EdB
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/11/13 4:18 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>> Alex,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
>>
>> and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
>> between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wondering which
>> one is leading...
>>
> What difference are you seeing? BTW, the only thing that probably shouldn't
> change is the fact that it is an array of stuff. The format of the stuff
> can change if it needs to. Also note that you can look at what
> Falcon/FalconJS is currently doing since it actually works (at least, well
> enough for the prototype).
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [FlexJS] data structure specs
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 3/11/13 4:18 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <er...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Could you please take a look at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
>
> and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
> between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wondering which
> one is leading...
>
What difference are you seeing? BTW, the only thing that probably shouldn't
change is the fact that it is an array of stuff. The format of the stuff
can change if it needs to. Also note that you can look at what
Falcon/FalconJS is currently doing since it actually works (at least, well
enough for the prototype).
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui