You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> on 2009/09/24 22:57:53 UTC
LUCENE 2.9 ANNOUNCE : Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.9.0
lucene wrote:
> Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
>
>
I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could
find their way ;)
Speaking of which, I basically plan to use the release announce that
I've been using. So if anyone has any gripes with it, or any further
suggestions, please weigh in soon.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: LUCENE 2.9 ANNOUNCE : Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.9.0
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
> > lucene wrote:
> > > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> > > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
> > >
> > >
> > I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> > give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could
> > find their way ;)
> >
> > Speaking of which, I basically plan to use the release announce that
> > I've been using. So if anyone has any gripes with it, or any further
> > suggestions, please weigh in soon.
>
> +1
>
> Thanks for creating the 2.4 branch! I would like to commit the fixes for
> the
Sorry, I meant 2.9 branch :-)
> contrib-Java-1.4 breaks there, to forget about them and if we possibly
> have
> to release 2.9.1, it will compile the contribs designed for Java 1.4
>
> By the way, I would also like to also copy the current 2.9 branch as the
> new
> backwards branch and create a new tag. When implementing generics, it
> would
> be good, if all tests compiled from version 2.9 with Java 1.4 would also
> run
> against 3.0 (to test if method signatures changed by having wrong upper
> bounds in the generics). When we removed deprecation, some tests also need
> to be removed in the backwards branch, but that can be done on request.
>
> Uwe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: LUCENE 2.9 ANNOUNCE : Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.9.0
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
> lucene wrote:
> > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
> >
> >
> I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could
> find their way ;)
>
> Speaking of which, I basically plan to use the release announce that
> I've been using. So if anyone has any gripes with it, or any further
> suggestions, please weigh in soon.
+1
Thanks for creating the 2.4 branch! I would like to commit the fixes for the
contrib-Java-1.4 breaks there, to forget about them and if we possibly have
to release 2.9.1, it will compile the contribs designed for Java 1.4
By the way, I would also like to also copy the current 2.9 branch as the new
backwards branch and create a new tag. When implementing generics, it would
be good, if all tests compiled from version 2.9 with Java 1.4 would also run
against 3.0 (to test if method signatures changed by having wrong upper
bounds in the generics). When we removed deprecation, some tests also need
to be removed in the backwards branch, but that can be done on request.
Uwe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: LUCENE 2.9 ANNOUNCE : Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.9.0
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> lucene wrote:
>> Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
>> /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
>>
>>
> I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could
> find their way ;)
Ahh OK good, thanks.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org