You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Yang Wang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/30 07:03:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-15791) Don't use
ForkJoinPool#commonPool() for executing asynchronous operations in
Fabric8FlinkKubeClient
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17026474#comment-17026474 ]
Yang Wang commented on FLINK-15791:
-----------------------------------
I think your concern is on point. I will fix it.
> Don't use ForkJoinPool#commonPool() for executing asynchronous operations in Fabric8FlinkKubeClient
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-15791
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15791
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Deployment / Kubernetes
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0
> Reporter: Till Rohrmann
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.11.0, 1.10.1
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should not use the {{ForkJoinPool#commonPool()}} in order to run asynchronous operations in the {{Fabric8FlinkKubeClient}} as it is done [here|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-kubernetes/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/kubeclient/Fabric8FlinkKubeClient.java#L315]. Since we don't know which other component is using this pool, it can be quite dangerous to use it as there might be congestion.
> Instead, I propose to provide an explicit I/O {{Executor}} which is used for running asynchronous operations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)