[jira] Commented: (MASSEMBLY-56) Refactor DirectoryMojo so it can be run either stand-alone or attached

["Dan Tran (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>]

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-56?page=comments#action_56629 ] 

Dan Tran commented on MASSEMBLY-56:
-----------------------------------

The patch looks good, but I am not certain about the name thou.  attached-directory indicates what user can deploy/ install "directory" type archiver. 
However the mojo never attach it to the project, which is correct. isn't it confusing?  Need to queury the core developers for suggestion


> Refactor DirectoryMojo so it can be run either stand-alone or attached
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MASSEMBLY-56
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-56
>      Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
>         Type: Improvement

>     Versions: 2.1
>     Reporter: John Didion
>      Fix For: 2.1
>  Attachments: MASSEMBLY-56.patch
>
>
> Pretty straight-forward. Just make the directory goal into two goals (like assembly and attached), one that can be run stand-alone and one that can be run attached to a lifecycle phase.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org