You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Matthew Xie <an...@163.com> on 2006/08/11 11:51:47 UTC
can network of brokers dothis feature?
Hi every!
I have two brokers, brokerA and brokerB.
I want to brokerA and brokerB establish the feature of network of brokers.
when I send message to brokerA, it will passed the message to the BrokerB.
here I need to notice that if brokerB fail down, then the messages be send
to brokerA cann't pass the messages to the brokerB. can network of brokers
do this feature if brokerB startup all the message live in brokerA could
pass to brokerB if they reestablish the network of brokers.
following is my conf. i try to do it , but failed. could some one tell me is
here something wrong??
BrokerA:
<networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://ip1:61616)"
failover="true" networkTTL="2">
name=bridgeA
dynamicOnly=false
conduitSubscriptions=true
decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority=false
<staticallyIncludedDestinations>
<queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
</staticallyIncludedDestinations>
<dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
<queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
</dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
</networkConnector>
BrokerB:
Using default networkConnector configuartion.
could someone do me a favor? Thx!
Matt
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/can-network-of-brokers-dothis-feature--tf2089718.html#a5759596
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: can network of brokers dothis feature?
Posted by Matthew Xie <an...@163.com>.
Thanks John for your reply!
I try to do it as your suggestion that testing it on removing the
destionation inclusions setting, but the problem still exists.
John Heitmann wrote:
>
> Ah, you're getting that from http://www.activemq.org/site/networks-of-
> brokers.html which looks like it has some bad character escaping or
> something going on. Try instead:
>
I actually check the character by ultraedit, not finding any bad character
escaping.
Follow is my testing steps:
A: start brokerA with network of brokers conf, see example as follow
<networkConnectors>
<networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://ip1:61616)"
failover="true" networkTTL="2"/>
</networkConnectors>
B: start brokerB by default:
C: then brokerA print out "Network connection between vm://localhost#0 and
tcp://ip1:61616(localhost) has been established." means nework connect
successfully.
D: then i send the text message to brokerA, and successfully recieved
message from brokerB. network of brokers works.
E: then i pull the brokerB out of the network service, then i find that
brokerA can't connect to it.
brokerA print out"WARN DemandForwardingBridge - Outbound
transport to localhost interruptted"
F: then i send the text message again to brokerA, so the message can't be
pass to brokerB as of can't be connected to brokerB.
G: then i recover the net work service for brokerB, and brokerA print out
"Network connection between vm://localhost#0 and tcp://ip1:61616(localhost)
has been established." again
H: then i try to recieve message from brokerB, nothing recieved. even if
send more messages to brokerA, no message passes to brokerB.
I: if i want it to be work again, just need to restart brokerA then i works
now.( it's a bad feeling to do it)
Here is my question again:
1. could anyone tell me the failure of my testing is that network of brokers
not provide such feature or is there something I configure it error or
mistake?
could anyone do me a favor? Thx!
Matt.
John Heitmann wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Matthew Xie wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi every!
>> I have two brokers, brokerA and brokerB.
>> I want to brokerA and brokerB establish the feature of network of
>> brokers.
>> when I send message to brokerA, it will passed the message to the
>> BrokerB.
>> here I need to notice that if brokerB fail down, then the messages
>> be send
>> to brokerA cann't pass the messages to the brokerB. can network of
>> brokers
>> do this feature if brokerB startup all the message live in brokerA
>> could
>> pass to brokerB if they reestablish the network of brokers.
>
> Yup, network of brokers should be perfect for this.
>
>> following is my conf. i try to do it , but failed. could some one
>> tell me is
>> here something wrong??
>>
>> BrokerA:
>> <networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://
>> ip1:61616)"
>> failover="true" networkTTL="2">
>> name=bridgeA
>> dynamicOnly=false
>> conduitSubscriptions=true
>> decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority=false
>>
>> <staticallyIncludedDestinations>
>> <queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
>> </staticallyIncludedDestinations>
>> <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>> <queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
>> </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>>
>> </networkConnector>
>
> Ah, you're getting that from http://www.activemq.org/site/networks-of-
> brokers.html which looks like it has some bad character escaping or
> something going on. Try instead:
>
> <networkConnectors>
> <networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://
> ip1:61616)" failover="true" networkTTL="2"/>
> </networkConnectors>
>
> Once you get that working you can add the destination inclusions back
> in.
>
> If you're on linux you can run 'xmllint --noout activemq.xml' to get
> help showing ill-formed xml constructs in your config.
>
> John
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/can-network-of-brokers-dothis-feature--tf2089718.html#a5790290
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: can network of brokers dothis feature?
Posted by John Heitmann <jh...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Matthew Xie wrote:
>
> Hi every!
> I have two brokers, brokerA and brokerB.
> I want to brokerA and brokerB establish the feature of network of
> brokers.
> when I send message to brokerA, it will passed the message to the
> BrokerB.
> here I need to notice that if brokerB fail down, then the messages
> be send
> to brokerA cann't pass the messages to the brokerB. can network of
> brokers
> do this feature if brokerB startup all the message live in brokerA
> could
> pass to brokerB if they reestablish the network of brokers.
Yup, network of brokers should be perfect for this.
> following is my conf. i try to do it , but failed. could some one
> tell me is
> here something wrong??
>
> BrokerA:
> <networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://
> ip1:61616)"
> failover="true" networkTTL="2">
> name=bridgeA
> dynamicOnly=false
> conduitSubscriptions=true
> decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority=false
>
> <staticallyIncludedDestinations>
> <queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
> </staticallyIncludedDestinations>
> <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
> <queue physicalName="QP_TEST.Queue"/>
> </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>
> </networkConnector>
Ah, you're getting that from http://www.activemq.org/site/networks-of-
brokers.html which looks like it has some bad character escaping or
something going on. Try instead:
<networkConnectors>
<networkConnector name="broker19" uri="static://(tcp://
ip1:61616)" failover="true" networkTTL="2"/>
</networkConnectors>
Once you get that working you can add the destination inclusions back
in.
If you're on linux you can run 'xmllint --noout activemq.xml' to get
help showing ill-formed xml constructs in your config.
John