upgrading old application - expressInstall.swf vs playerProductInstall.swf

[DavidM <dm...@gmail.com>]

Hi, I've been upgrading an old (2011) flex app and, as an experiment, decided
to generate a new application with Flash Builder 4.7 and compare with that
generated in 2011 using Flash Builder 4.5.

This is what I discovered:

identical:
 index.template.html 

completely different:
 swfobject.js

additionally the file: playerProductInstall.swf
is replaced by: expresinstall.swf

So, my question is this: is it recommended to replace the files:
swfobject.js and playerProductInstall.swf

with the newer swfobject.js and the expresinstall.swf

Thanks

David




--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/upgrading-old-application-expressInstall-swf-vs-playerProductInstall-swf-tp9357.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: upgrading old application - expressInstall.swf vs playerProductInstall.swf

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

It’s optional.  playerproductInstall is Adobe-proprietary so Apache Flex
opted to use expressInstall instead.

On 1/8/15, 10:25 AM, "DavidM" <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi, I've been upgrading an old (2011) flex app and, as an experiment,
>decided
>to generate a new application with Flash Builder 4.7 and compare with that
>generated in 2011 using Flash Builder 4.5.
>
>This is what I discovered:
>
>identical:
> index.template.html
>
>completely different:
> swfobject.js
>
>additionally the file: playerProductInstall.swf
>is replaced by: expresinstall.swf
>
>So, my question is this: is it recommended to replace the files:
>swfobject.js and playerProductInstall.swf
>
>with the newer swfobject.js and the expresinstall.swf
>
>Thanks
>
>David
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/upgrading-old-application-e
>xpressInstall-swf-vs-playerProductInstall-swf-tp9357.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.