You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Jake Conk <ja...@gmail.com> on 2008/08/12 22:26:26 UTC
Searching Questions
1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
`category`. Is there a way to do this?
2) When searching for multiple results are the following identical
since "*_facet" and "*_facet_mv" have their type's both set to string?
/select?q=tag_facet:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet:%22Barack+Obama%22
/select?q=tag_facet_mv:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet_mv:%22Barack+Obama%22
3) If I'm searching for something that is in a text field but I
specify it as a facet string rather than a text type would it still
search within text fields or would it just limit the search to string
fields?
4) Is there a page that will show me different querying combinations
or can someone post some more examples?
5) Anyone else notice returning back the data in php (&wt=phps)
doesn't unserialize? I am using PHP 5.3 w/ a nightly copy of Solr from
last week.
Thanks,
- Jake
Re: Searching Questions
Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Jake Conk <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4) Is there a page that will show me different querying combinations
> or can someone post some more examples?
You can see some examples of facet use at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Searching Questions
Posted by ravindra goyal <ra...@gmail.com>.
just adding ..
#1 search in a specific field:
-----------------------------------------------
it is always possible using 'q.alt' --> e.g u want to search in category
then your query might be like
(u are searching for keyword 'comuters')
http://localhost:8080/select/?q.alt=(category:(computers))
to search in multiple fields say category and sections
http://localhost:8080/select/?q.alt=(category:(computers)+OR+sections:(computers))
to add boosting to it
http://localhost:8080/select/?q.alt=(category:(computers)
^2+OR+sections:(computers))
--------------------------------------------------
#3 text field and facets string :
what i have observed is, it will always search in text field as usual (it
won't search it as string ) and your facet will be common strings (single
word or multiple worlds) extracted from the text field and facets count will
be the availability of that particular strings in no of documents.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Norberto Meijome <fr...@meijome.net>wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:26 -0700
> "Jake Conk" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
> > `category`. Is there a way to do this?
>
> of course. Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax (in
> particular, follow the link to Lucene syntax..)
>
> >
> > 2) When searching for multiple results are the following identical
> > since "*_facet" and "*_facet_mv" have their type's both set to string?
> >
> > /select?q=tag_facet:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet:%22Barack+Obama%22
> >
> /select?q=tag_facet_mv:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet_mv:%22Barack+Obama%22
>
> Erik H. already answered this question , in another of your emails. Check
> your mailbox or the lists archives.
>
> > 3) If I'm searching for something that is in a text field but I
> > specify it as a facet string rather than a text type would it still
> > search within text fields or would it just limit the search to string
> > fields?
>
> I am not sure what you mean by 'a facet string' . You facet on fields, SOLR
> automatically creates facets on those fields based on the results to your
> query .
>
> > 4) Is there a page that will show me different querying combinations
> > or can someone post some more examples?
>
> Have you check the wiki ? which page do you suggest needs more examples?
>
>
> > 5) Anyone else notice returning back the data in php (&wt=phps)
> > doesn't unserialize? I am using PHP 5.3 w/ a nightly copy of Solr from
> > last week.
>
> sorry, haven't used PHP + SOLR
>
> cheers,
> B
> _________________________
> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>
> "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
> nothing."
> Edmund Burke
>
> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have
> been Warned.
>
Re: Searching Questions
Posted by Norberto Meijome <fr...@meijome.net>.
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:26 -0700
"Jake Conk" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
> `category`. Is there a way to do this?
of course. Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax (in particular, follow the link to Lucene syntax..)
>
> 2) When searching for multiple results are the following identical
> since "*_facet" and "*_facet_mv" have their type's both set to string?
>
> /select?q=tag_facet:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet:%22Barack+Obama%22
> /select?q=tag_facet_mv:%22John+McCain%22+OR+tag_facet_mv:%22Barack+Obama%22
Erik H. already answered this question , in another of your emails. Check your mailbox or the lists archives.
> 3) If I'm searching for something that is in a text field but I
> specify it as a facet string rather than a text type would it still
> search within text fields or would it just limit the search to string
> fields?
I am not sure what you mean by 'a facet string' . You facet on fields, SOLR automatically creates facets on those fields based on the results to your query .
> 4) Is there a page that will show me different querying combinations
> or can someone post some more examples?
Have you check the wiki ? which page do you suggest needs more examples?
> 5) Anyone else notice returning back the data in php (&wt=phps)
> doesn't unserialize? I am using PHP 5.3 w/ a nightly copy of Solr from
> last week.
sorry, haven't used PHP + SOLR
cheers,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Edmund Burke
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.