You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/05/05 01:01:53 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] szehon-ho commented on pull request #3457: Core: Improve performance of expire snapshot by not double-scanning retained Snapshots

szehon-ho commented on PR #3457:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3457#issuecomment-1118070274

   I'm not sure if people think these changes are too hacky.
   
   Another option I've thought, is to implement IncrementalScan (https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4580) for All_files table (to be added in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4694), which will allow snapshot filtering.  Then rewrite ExpireSnapshotAction to use that table.
   
   I wonder was there was some reason initially to use all_manifests table and ManifestReadTask, rather than relying on all_files table?  @rdblue @aokolnychyi for any thoughts/information.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org