You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/03 13:48:10 UTC
Re: build.xml, WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
I also ran the "ant signeddist" without any problems.
@Janne: Could the SQLException be something failing on your local machine ?
How to proceed ?
regards,
Harry
2012/5/26 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> I've been able to run "ant signeddist" without any problems. I've also
> checked svn status on the new tag, just to ensure that I didn't left any
> files behind a while ago, and there aren't neither modified nor pending
> files :-?
>
> Googlin a bit on the stacktrace, and it might seem that either port 9001
> (hsqldb default port) was up before running the tests or hsqldb jar is
> missing/unreadable (they seem to me weird causes, though). Is someone else
> reproducing this error?
>
>
> regards,
> juan pablo
>
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > Trying to run "ant signeddist" gives me
> >
> > db-setup:
> > [echo] Setting up the database tables.
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:317: The following error
> > occurred while executing this line:
> > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1389: The following error
> > occurred while executing this line:
> > /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1420:
> java.sql.SQLException:
> > Connection is broken
> > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
> > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcConnection.<init>(Unknown Source)
> > at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.getConnection(Unknown Source)
> > at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.connect(Unknown Source)
> > at
> > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JDBCTask.getConnection(JDBCTask.java:370)
> > at
> > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.getConnection(SQLExec.java:942)
> > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.execute(SQLExec.java:614)
> >
> >
> > Is it just me and my config or is this happening for everyone?
> >
> > (Freshly checked out from repo.)
> >
> > /Janne
> >
> > On May 26, 2012, at 13:46 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> >
> > > done,
> > >
> > > just moved tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_rc1 and created a
> new
> > > rc tag at
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
> > >
> > >
> > > br,
> > > juan pablo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> > > juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Janne (and all)
> > >>
> > >> apologies on no following up on this. I've had a lot of work at job
> the
> > >> last few weeks, so I've been unable to do pretty much anything :-s
> I'll
> > >> create the tag this weekend
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> regards & thx for looking at this,
> > >> juan pablo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> > Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Well, can you just create the tag and let me know which tag to build
> > and
> > >>> sign?
> > >>>
> > >>> /Janne
> > >>>
> > >>> On May 9, 2012, at 23:11 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> now that I did have a while to check current tag, Janne I think I've
> > >>>> misspoke about the tag contents. I was intending that the new tag
> > >>> contained
> > >>>> the build.xml fix plus JSPWIKI-683... My apologies on not having
> > >>> explained
> > >>>> myself properly :-S
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So, as for now, we have two options:
> > >>>> a.- vote on current tag (2.9.0-incubating-0), no need of generating
> > new
> > >>>> artifacts.
> > >>>> b.- generate a new tag (can do it myself) with JSPWIKI-683. If we go
> > >>>> through this option, we could also add the fix for JSPWIKI-728 and
> > call
> > >>> a
> > >>>> vote on 2.9.0-incubating-2.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Option b.- would mean generating new artifacts. It's not like they
> are
> > >>>> mandatory in order to run the vote, we vote on a tag and the
> artifacts
> > >>> are
> > >>>> there for convenience; however, if the vote succeeds, which seems to
> > me
> > >>>> likely to happen, we will have to generate them anyway.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> regards,
> > >>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> > >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The new signed artifacts are at
> > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> /Janne
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On May 4, 2012, at 20:34 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm sending the email withdrawing the vote right now. Janne, can
> you
> > >>>>> push a
> > >>>>>> new tag + rc? thanks in advance!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> br,
> > >>>>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> > >>>>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> So this seems (sort of) lazy consensus towards rolling + voting
> on
> > >>>>> another
> > >>>>>>> rc. I'll withdraw the ongoing vote in 60 minutes from now, so
> > anyone
> > >>>>>>> feeling that the vote should continue can express it before
> closing
> > >>> it.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> regards,
> > >>>>>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Harry Metske <
> > harry.metske@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2012/5/3 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I think that (someone please correct me if I'm mistaken) would
> > >>> imply
> > >>>>>>>>> withdrawing the current vote, roll a new RC and restart the
> vote
> > on
> > >>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>> new RC.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> If this is ok with all, then we should:
> > >>>>>>>>> 1.- svn rename tag 2.9.0 to 2.9.0-rc-0
> > >>>>>>>>> 2.- make a new 2.9.0 tag from trunk (2.9.0-incubating-2?), so
> > >>>>>>>> JSPWIKI-683
> > >>>>>>>>> gets included as well, with the required changes on build.xml
> > >>>>>>>>> 3.- recast the vote stating that this is the 2nd rc of 2.9.0
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I would go +0.1 on this procedure [1], so, anyone else, what do
> > you
> > >>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> rgrds,
> > >>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> > >>>>>>>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Oops, that's my bad. Yes, you need to manually change the
> > >>> build.xml
> > >>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> this particular tag. Shall we reroll the artifacts and the
> tag?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> /Janne
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 3 May 2012, at 01:36, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> during my checks, I wasn't able to reproduce the source zip
> > file
> > >>>>>>>> due to
> > >>>>>>>>>> one single point.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Could you please check whether the correct build.xml gets
> > >>> included
> > >>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>> your environments? Over here, it seems to always include the
> one
> > >>> from
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> trunk, although I made svn.tag = tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Florian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 13:05:30
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> This is an incubator release for Apache JSPWiki, version
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2.9.0-incubating.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It fixes the following issues:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by 72 hours from now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are
> > >>> provided
> > >>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>> convenience.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary files:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > >>> release:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: build.xml, WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
Posted by Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>.
thanks!! :-)
I'll ran the voting thread tomorrow afternoon/evening (or if anyone wants
to do it before, please free to do so)
regards,
juan pablo
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> NVM, figured out what's going on. My mistake.
>
> Signed artifacts are at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>
> /Janne
>
> On Jun 3, 2012, at 14:48 , Harry Metske wrote:
>
> > I also ran the "ant signeddist" without any problems.
> > @Janne: Could the SQLException be something failing on your local
> machine ?
> >
> > How to proceed ?
> >
> > regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
> > 2012/5/26 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been able to run "ant signeddist" without any problems. I've also
> >> checked svn status on the new tag, just to ensure that I didn't left any
> >> files behind a while ago, and there aren't neither modified nor pending
> >> files :-?
> >>
> >> Googlin a bit on the stacktrace, and it might seem that either port 9001
> >> (hsqldb default port) was up before running the tests or hsqldb jar is
> >> missing/unreadable (they seem to me weird causes, though). Is someone
> else
> >> reproducing this error?
> >>
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> juan pablo
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Trying to run "ant signeddist" gives me
> >>>
> >>> db-setup:
> >>> [echo] Setting up the database tables.
> >>>
> >>> BUILD FAILED
> >>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:317: The following error
> >>> occurred while executing this line:
> >>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1389: The following error
> >>> occurred while executing this line:
> >>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1420:
> >> java.sql.SQLException:
> >>> Connection is broken
> >>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
> >>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcConnection.<init>(Unknown Source)
> >>> at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.getConnection(Unknown Source)
> >>> at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.connect(Unknown Source)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JDBCTask.getConnection(JDBCTask.java:370)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.getConnection(SQLExec.java:942)
> >>> at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.execute(SQLExec.java:614)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is it just me and my config or is this happening for everyone?
> >>>
> >>> (Freshly checked out from repo.)
> >>>
> >>> /Janne
> >>>
> >>> On May 26, 2012, at 13:46 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> done,
> >>>>
> >>>> just moved tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_rc1 and created a
> >> new
> >>>> rc tag at
> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> br,
> >>>> juan pablo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> >>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Janne (and all)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> apologies on no following up on this. I've had a lot of work at job
> >> the
> >>>>> last few weeks, so I've been unable to do pretty much anything :-s
> >> I'll
> >>>>> create the tag this weekend
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards & thx for looking at this,
> >>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, can you just create the tag and let me know which tag to build
> >>> and
> >>>>>> sign?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 9, 2012, at 23:11 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> now that I did have a while to check current tag, Janne I think
> I've
> >>>>>>> misspoke about the tag contents. I was intending that the new tag
> >>>>>> contained
> >>>>>>> the build.xml fix plus JSPWIKI-683... My apologies on not having
> >>>>>> explained
> >>>>>>> myself properly :-S
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So, as for now, we have two options:
> >>>>>>> a.- vote on current tag (2.9.0-incubating-0), no need of generating
> >>> new
> >>>>>>> artifacts.
> >>>>>>> b.- generate a new tag (can do it myself) with JSPWIKI-683. If we
> go
> >>>>>>> through this option, we could also add the fix for JSPWIKI-728 and
> >>> call
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> vote on 2.9.0-incubating-2.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Option b.- would mean generating new artifacts. It's not like they
> >> are
> >>>>>>> mandatory in order to run the vote, we vote on a tag and the
> >> artifacts
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>>> there for convenience; however, if the vote succeeds, which seems
> to
> >>> me
> >>>>>>> likely to happen, we will have to generate them anyway.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The new signed artifacts are at
> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On May 4, 2012, at 20:34 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm sending the email withdrawing the vote right now. Janne, can
> >> you
> >>>>>>>> push a
> >>>>>>>>> new tag + rc? thanks in advance!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> br,
> >>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> >>>>>>>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So this seems (sort of) lazy consensus towards rolling + voting
> >> on
> >>>>>>>> another
> >>>>>>>>>> rc. I'll withdraw the ongoing vote in 60 minutes from now, so
> >>> anyone
> >>>>>>>>>> feeling that the vote should continue can express it before
> >> closing
> >>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Harry Metske <
> >>> harry.metske@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2012/5/3 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
> >> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that (someone please correct me if I'm mistaken) would
> >>>>>> imply
> >>>>>>>>>>>> withdrawing the current vote, roll a new RC and restart the
> >> vote
> >>> on
> >>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>> new RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If this is ok with all, then we should:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.- svn rename tag 2.9.0 to 2.9.0-rc-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.- make a new 2.9.0 tag from trunk (2.9.0-incubating-2?), so
> >>>>>>>>>>> JSPWIKI-683
> >>>>>>>>>>>> gets included as well, with the required changes on build.xml
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3.- recast the vote stating that this is the 2nd rc of 2.9.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would go +0.1 on this procedure [1], so, anyone else, what
> do
> >>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>> think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rgrds,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >>>>>>>>>>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops, that's my bad. Yes, you need to manually change the
> >>>>>> build.xml
> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this particular tag. Shall we reroll the artifacts and the
> >> tag?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 May 2012, at 01:36, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> during my checks, I wasn't able to reproduce the source zip
> >>> file
> >>>>>>>>>>> due to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one single point.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please check whether the correct build.xml gets
> >>>>>> included
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your environments? Over here, it seems to always include the
> >> one
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> trunk, although I made svn.tag = tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 13:05:30
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is an incubator release for Apache JSPWiki, version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9.0-incubating.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes the following issues:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by 72 hours from now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are
> >>>>>> provided
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary files:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: build.xml, WAS: Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
NVM, figured out what's going on. My mistake.
Signed artifacts are at
http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
/Janne
On Jun 3, 2012, at 14:48 , Harry Metske wrote:
> I also ran the "ant signeddist" without any problems.
> @Janne: Could the SQLException be something failing on your local machine ?
>
> How to proceed ?
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
>
> 2012/5/26 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <ju...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been able to run "ant signeddist" without any problems. I've also
>> checked svn status on the new tag, just to ensure that I didn't left any
>> files behind a while ago, and there aren't neither modified nor pending
>> files :-?
>>
>> Googlin a bit on the stacktrace, and it might seem that either port 9001
>> (hsqldb default port) was up before running the tests or hsqldb jar is
>> missing/unreadable (they seem to me weird causes, though). Is someone else
>> reproducing this error?
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> juan pablo
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Trying to run "ant signeddist" gives me
>>>
>>> db-setup:
>>> [echo] Setting up the database tables.
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:317: The following error
>>> occurred while executing this line:
>>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1389: The following error
>>> occurred while executing this line:
>>> /Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki-svn/build.xml:1420:
>> java.sql.SQLException:
>>> Connection is broken
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcConnection.<init>(Unknown Source)
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.getConnection(Unknown Source)
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver.connect(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JDBCTask.getConnection(JDBCTask.java:370)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.getConnection(SQLExec.java:942)
>>> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.SQLExec.execute(SQLExec.java:614)
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it just me and my config or is this happening for everyone?
>>>
>>> (Freshly checked out from repo.)
>>>
>>> /Janne
>>>
>>> On May 26, 2012, at 13:46 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>
>>>> done,
>>>>
>>>> just moved tags/jspwiki_2_9_0 to tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_rc1 and created a
>> new
>>>> rc tag at
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> br,
>>>> juan pablo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
>>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Janne (and all)
>>>>>
>>>>> apologies on no following up on this. I've had a lot of work at job
>> the
>>>>> last few weeks, so I've been unable to do pretty much anything :-s
>> I'll
>>>>> create the tag this weekend
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> regards & thx for looking at this,
>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, can you just create the tag and let me know which tag to build
>>> and
>>>>>> sign?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 9, 2012, at 23:11 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now that I did have a while to check current tag, Janne I think I've
>>>>>>> misspoke about the tag contents. I was intending that the new tag
>>>>>> contained
>>>>>>> the build.xml fix plus JSPWIKI-683... My apologies on not having
>>>>>> explained
>>>>>>> myself properly :-S
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, as for now, we have two options:
>>>>>>> a.- vote on current tag (2.9.0-incubating-0), no need of generating
>>> new
>>>>>>> artifacts.
>>>>>>> b.- generate a new tag (can do it myself) with JSPWIKI-683. If we go
>>>>>>> through this option, we could also add the fix for JSPWIKI-728 and
>>> call
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> vote on 2.9.0-incubating-2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Option b.- would mean generating new artifacts. It's not like they
>> are
>>>>>>> mandatory in order to run the vote, we vote on a tag and the
>> artifacts
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> there for convenience; however, if the vote succeeds, which seems to
>>> me
>>>>>>> likely to happen, we will have to generate them anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The new signed artifacts are at
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 4, 2012, at 20:34 , Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm sending the email withdrawing the vote right now. Janne, can
>> you
>>>>>>>> push a
>>>>>>>>> new tag + rc? thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
>>>>>>>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So this seems (sort of) lazy consensus towards rolling + voting
>> on
>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>> rc. I'll withdraw the ongoing vote in 60 minutes from now, so
>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>> feeling that the vote should continue can express it before
>> closing
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Harry Metske <
>>> harry.metske@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/5/3 Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <
>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that (someone please correct me if I'm mistaken) would
>>>>>> imply
>>>>>>>>>>>> withdrawing the current vote, roll a new RC and restart the
>> vote
>>> on
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> new RC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If this is ok with all, then we should:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.- svn rename tag 2.9.0 to 2.9.0-rc-0
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.- make a new 2.9.0 tag from trunk (2.9.0-incubating-2?), so
>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWIKI-683
>>>>>>>>>>>> gets included as well, with the required changes on build.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.- recast the vote stating that this is the 2nd rc of 2.9.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would go +0.1 on this procedure [1], so, anyone else, what do
>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> rgrds,
>>>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>>>>>>>>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oops, that's my bad. Yes, you need to manually change the
>>>>>> build.xml
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this particular tag. Shall we reroll the artifacts and the
>> tag?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3 May 2012, at 01:36, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during my checks, I wasn't able to reproduce the source zip
>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>> due to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one single point.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please check whether the correct build.xml gets
>>>>>> included
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your environments? Over here, it seems to always include the
>> one
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trunk, although I made svn.tag = tags/jspwiki_2_9_0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <ju...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 13:05:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.0-incubating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is an incubator release for Apache JSPWiki, version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9.0-incubating.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes the following issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by 72 hours from now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are
>>>>>> provided
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary files:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jalkanen/JSPWiki/2.9.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>