You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com> on 2006/09/15 22:24:53 UTC

[doc] "fullversionnumber" variable for the devguide is set differently

I'm putting the JDBC 4.0 warning text into a variable in the
conrefs.dita file for each book, which lets me simply include a
reference in each file that needs the warning that looks like this :

   <p><ph conref="refconrefs.dita#vers/jdbc4disclaimer"></ph></p>

The new variable uses the "fullversionnumber" variable that is already
defined in the conrefs.dita files.

Most books set it like this:

   <p><ph id="fullversionnumber">Version 10.2</ph>

But the devguide set it to this (and it really lept out at me in the
drafts of the JDBC 4 warning text that I'm reviewing):

   <p><ph id="fullversionnumber">Open Source</ph></p>

I'm going to modify the devguide to use "Version 10.2" like the others.

If anybody can think of anything that might break as a result, please
let me know.

thanks,

 -jean

Re: [doc] "fullversionnumber" variable for the devguide is set differently

Posted by Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com>.
That is really odd Jean, it should be like the other books.  I have a
way to check to see if the conref is used at all in the dev guide and
it is not.  You should be able to change it without impacting
anything.

Laura

On 9/15/06, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> I'm putting the JDBC 4.0 warning text into a variable in the
> conrefs.dita file for each book, which lets me simply include a
> reference in each file that needs the warning that looks like this :
>
>   <p><ph conref="refconrefs.dita#vers/jdbc4disclaimer"></ph></p>
>
> The new variable uses the "fullversionnumber" variable that is already
> defined in the conrefs.dita files.
>
> Most books set it like this:
>
>   <p><ph id="fullversionnumber">Version 10.2</ph>
>
> But the devguide set it to this (and it really lept out at me in the
> drafts of the JDBC 4 warning text that I'm reviewing):
>
>   <p><ph id="fullversionnumber">Open Source</ph></p>
>
> I'm going to modify the devguide to use "Version 10.2" like the others.
>
> If anybody can think of anything that might break as a result, please
> let me know.
>
> thanks,
>
>  -jean
>


-- 
Laura Stewart