[general] Result for r681495 (Was: Re: [vote] Declare r681495 as M7)

[Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>]

+1 from Oliver, Chunrong, Xiao-Feng, Tony, Sean, Mark and Sian

-1 from Nathan, which has been retracted.

No other votes so we declare r681495 as M7.

Well done everyone.

Thanks,

Sian


On 20/08/2008, Sian January <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me too
>
> On 20/08/2008, Nathan Beyer <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm fine with releasing now. I didn't like that the test results
> > couldn't be repeated. Since it was the test itself we can move ahead.
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/20/08, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <3b...@mail.gmail.com>,
> > > "Nathan Beyer" writes:
> > >>
> > >> nathan:~$ update-alternatives --display javap
> > >> javap - status is auto.
> > >>  link currently points to /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/javap
> > >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/javap - priority 63
> > >>  slave javap.1.gz: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/man/man1/javap.1.gz
> > >> Current `best' version is /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/javap.
> > >
> > > Hopefully Sian will provide a quick fix for this common case.  In the
> > > meantime, what is you position on M7?  Do you think M7 needs a fix for
> > > this issue?  Are there other must-fix issues that you consider blockers?
> > >
> > > I would not be unhappy to release r681495 as M7 since these are test
> > > issues rather than code issues and we have released with failures due
> > > to bad tests before.  So I vote +1 on this thread.
> > >
> > > Of course, if Sian can provide a prompt fix for this test issue then she
> > > has my +1 to commit it and we can start another vote.
> > >
> > >> Perhaps using 'javap' isn't the most stable/portable approach. Can we
> > >> use one of the bytecode libraries we have already and run the class
> > >> files through that?
> > >
> > > I'm sure Sian is considering other options for M8. ;-)
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>


-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU