You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/07/29 17:38:23 UTC
[GitHub] [beam] ibzib commented on a change in pull request #12400: [BEAM-10595] Remove rules that not work well with Java UDF
ibzib commented on a change in pull request #12400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/12400#discussion_r461959139
##########
File path: sdks/java/extensions/sql/zetasql/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/sql/zetasql/ZetaSQLQueryPlanner.java
##########
@@ -93,6 +95,13 @@ public ZetaSQLQueryPlanner(JdbcConnection jdbcConnection, RuleSet[] ruleSets) {
// requires the JoinCommuteRule, which doesn't work without struct flattening.
if (rule instanceof JoinCommuteRule) {
continue;
+ } else if (rule instanceof FilterCalcMergeRule || rule instanceof ProjectCalcMergeRule) {
+ // In order to support Java UDF, we need both BeamZetaSqlCalcRel and BeamCalcRel. It is
+ // because BeamZetaSqlCalcRel can execute ZetaSQL built-in functions while BeamCalcRel
+ // can execute UDFs. So during planning, we expect both Filter and Project are converted
+ // to a Calc before merging with other Projec/Filter/Calc. Thus we should not add
Review comment:
Nit: spelling/grammar
```suggestion
// to Calc nodes before merging with other Project/Filter/Calc nodes. Thus we should not add
```
##########
File path: sdks/java/extensions/sql/zetasql/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/sql/zetasql/ZetaSQLQueryPlanner.java
##########
@@ -93,6 +95,13 @@ public ZetaSQLQueryPlanner(JdbcConnection jdbcConnection, RuleSet[] ruleSets) {
// requires the JoinCommuteRule, which doesn't work without struct flattening.
if (rule instanceof JoinCommuteRule) {
continue;
+ } else if (rule instanceof FilterCalcMergeRule || rule instanceof ProjectCalcMergeRule) {
+ // In order to support Java UDF, we need both BeamZetaSqlCalcRel and BeamCalcRel. It is
+ // because BeamZetaSqlCalcRel can execute ZetaSQL built-in functions while BeamCalcRel
+ // can execute UDFs. So during planning, we expect both Filter and Project are converted
+ // to a Calc before merging with other Projec/Filter/Calc. Thus we should not add
Review comment:
It'd be helpful to specifically mention `CalcMergeRule` here.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org