You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> on 2011/06/15 04:39:17 UTC
Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Hi all,
As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
Hama 0.3-incubating release.
What do you think?
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Of course.
In near future, I'll increase the size of Hama cluster to 1,000
physical nodes. :D
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:21 PM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
> This sounds great. Any chance to share such experience? That would be good to learn from real practice.
>
> -----Original message-----
> From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date:Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:23:49 +0900
> Subject:Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
>
> Going to try and roll up RC1 tonight.
>
> Now I'm testing Hama cluster on physical 32 nodes.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> 2011/6/15 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>>
>>> Thanks for noticing that!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
>>> > As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because
>>> it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original message-----
>>> > From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>>> > To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
>>> > Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
>>> >
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
>>> >
>>> > We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
>>> > and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
>>> >
>>> > After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
>>> > Hama 0.3-incubating release.
>>> >
>>> > What do you think?
>>> >
>>> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> > @eddieyoon
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ChiaHung Lin
>>> > Department of Information Management
>>> > National University of Kaohsiung
>>> > Taiwan
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> @eddieyoon
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Jungblut
>> Berlin
>>
>> mobile: 0170-3081070
>>
>> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
>> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
>
> --
> ChiaHung Lin
> Department of Information Management
> National University of Kaohsiung
> Taiwan
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>.
This sounds great. Any chance to share such experience? That would be good to learn from real practice.
-----Original message-----
From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:23:49 +0900
Subject:Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Going to try and roll up RC1 tonight.
Now I'm testing Hama cluster on physical 32 nodes.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2011/6/15 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> Thanks for noticing that!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
>> > As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because
>> it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
>> >
>> > -----Original message-----
>> > From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> > To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
>> > Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
>> >
>> > We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
>> > and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
>> >
>> > After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
>> > Hama 0.3-incubating release.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> > @eddieyoon
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ChiaHung Lin
>> > Department of Information Management
>> > National University of Kaohsiung
>> > Taiwan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
--
ChiaHung Lin
Department of Information Management
National University of Kaohsiung
Taiwan
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Going to try and roll up RC1 tonight.
Now I'm testing Hama cluster on physical 32 nodes.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> 2011/6/15 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> Thanks for noticing that!
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
>> > As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because
>> it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
>> >
>> > -----Original message-----
>> > From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> > To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
>> > Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
>> >
>> > We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
>> > and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
>> >
>> > After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
>> > Hama 0.3-incubating release.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> > @eddieyoon
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ChiaHung Lin
>> > Department of Information Management
>> > National University of Kaohsiung
>> > Taiwan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>.
+1
2011/6/15 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> Thanks for noticing that!
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
> > As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because
> it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> > To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
> > Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
> >
> > We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
> > and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
> >
> > After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
> > Hama 0.3-incubating release.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> > @eddieyoon
> >
> >
> > --
> > ChiaHung Lin
> > Department of Information Management
> > National University of Kaohsiung
> > Taiwan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin
mobile: 0170-3081070
business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Thanks for noticing that!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
> As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
>
> -----Original message-----
> From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
> Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
>
> Hi all,
>
> As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
>
> We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
> and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
>
> After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
> Hama 0.3-incubating release.
>
> What do you think?
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
>
> --
> ChiaHung Lin
> Department of Information Management
> National University of Kaohsiung
> Taiwan
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Posted by ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>.
As roadmap plans in wiki, it seems that HAMA-370 can be removed because it is more related to fault tolerance issue.
-----Original message-----
From:Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:39:17 +0900
Subject:Cutting a 0.3-incubating release
Hi all,
As steve mentioned, we might want to release a 0.3 soon.
We've added some new features (web UI, message bundle, BSP examples)
and fixed bunch of bugs. Moreover, vote process seems VERY slow.
After all opened issues[1] are solved, I'd like to open the vote for
Hama 0.3-incubating release.
What do you think?
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA/fixforversion/12315100
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
--
ChiaHung Lin
Department of Information Management
National University of Kaohsiung
Taiwan